Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32550271›Full record

ArticleCell systems2020

MATCHA: Probing multi-way chromatin interaction with hypergraph representation learning.

Ruochi Zhang, Jian Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell systems, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Machine and Deep Learning Methods for Predicting 3D Genome Organization.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. A Lightweight Framework For Chromatin Loop Detection at the Single-Cell Level.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Chromatin Hubs: A biological and computational outlook.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ruochi ZhangComputational Biology Department, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Jian MaComputational Biology Department, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.

Funding

Mapping Technology DevelopmentU54DK107965 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI BELMONT, ANDREW STEVEN · 2015 to 2019
$8.6M
Computational Methods for Next-Generation Comparative GenomicsR01HG007352 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI MA, JIAN · 2014 to 2023
$2.8M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG007352NIDDK NIH HHS U54 DK107965
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in ligation-free, genome-wide chromatin interaction mapping such as SPRITE and ChIA-Drop have enabled the identification of simultaneous interactions involving multiple genomic loci within the same nuclei, which are informative to delineate higher-order genome organization and gene regulation mechanisms at single-nucleus resolution. Unfortunately, computational methods for analyzing multi-way chromatin interaction data are significantly underexplored. Here we develop an algorithm, called MATCHA, based on hypergraph representation learning where multi-way chromatin interactions are represented as hyperedges. Applications to SPRITE and ChIA-Drop data suggest that MATCHA is effective to denoise the data and make

Indexed as

AlgorithmsChromatinData AnalysisDNA-Binding ProteinsGenomeGenomicsModels, TheoreticalProtein Interaction MappingSoftwareChromatinDNA-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID32550271
PMCPMC7299183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.