Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32550214›Full record

ReviewJournal of diabetes and metabolic disorders2020

Effect of probiotic foods and supplements on blood pressure: a systematic review of meta-analyses studies of controlled trials.

Hanieh-Sadat Ejtahed, Edris Ardeshirlarijani, Ozra Tabatabaei-Malazy, Zahra Hoseini-Tavassol, Shirin Hasani-Ranjbar, Ahmad-Reza Soroush, Bagher Larijani

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Microbiota research in Iran; current knowledge and future perspective.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Benefits of Biotics for Cardiovascular Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Intestinal barrier dysfunction as a therapeutic target for cardiovascular disease.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hanieh-Sadat EjtahedObesity and Eating Habits Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Edris ArdeshirlarijaniSimon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada.
Ozra Tabatabaei-MalazyNon-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-0188-9721
Zahra Hoseini-TavassolDepartment of Mycobacteriology and Pulmonary Research, Microbiology Research Center, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
Shirin Hasani-RanjbarObesity and Eating Habits Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ahmad-Reza SoroushObesity and Eating Habits Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Bagher LarijaniEndocrinology and Metabolism Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-5386-7597
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IRPasteur Institute of Iran · IRSimon Fraser University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRecent evidences suggested that hypertension was associated with changes in gut microbiota composition. As intervention with probiotics might be considered as one of the approaches for modulating gut microbiota, the objective of the present study was to systematically review the meta-analyses of controlled trials (CTs) to elucidate the effects of probiotics on blood pressure.

methodsWe searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases until November 2019 to explore all the meta-analyses conducted on the CTs assessing the efficacy of probiotics in the management of blood pressure (BP). Meta-analyses performed on

resultsFrom the 111 records which were identified during the literature search, 5 meta-analyses met the selection criteria. Total sample size was 2703 subjects (1009 subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)), aged 12-75 years from both sexes. Results of meta-analyses have been shown a moderate effect of probiotics on BP in hypertensive adults with/without T2DM; from 3.10 to 5.04 mmHg for systolic blood pressure (SBP) and from 0.39 to 3.84 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure (DBP) after 3-24 weeks consumption. These effects were greater in adults with BP ≥ 130/85, by dairy products, by Asian fermented products with multiple species and higher dose of probiotics (≥ 10

conclusionIt seems probiotic foods and supplements which were contained high dose multiple species of probiotic bacteria could be more effective in BP control.

Indexed as

Blood pressureGut microbiotaMeta-analysisProbiotics

Identifiers

PMID32550214
PMCPMC7271294
OpenAlexW3016880289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.