Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32550134›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2020

Combination of generative adversarial network and convolutional neural network for automatic subcentimeter pulmonary adenocarcinoma classification.

Yunpeng Wang, Lingxiao Zhou, Mingming Wang, Cheng Shao, Lili Shi, Shuyi Yang, Zhiyong Zhang, Mingxiang Feng, Fei Shan, Lei Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Multi-channel multi-task deep learning for predictingQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yunpeng WangShanghai Public Health Clinical Center and Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Lingxiao ZhouShanghai Public Health Clinical Center and Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Mingming WangSchool of Computer Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Cheng ShaoSchool of Computer Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Lili ShiShanghai Public Health Clinical Center and Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Shuyi YangShanghai Public Health Clinical Center and Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Zhiyong ZhangShanghai Public Health Clinical Center and Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Mingxiang FengChest Surgery Department, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Fei ShanShanghai Public Health Clinical Center and Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Lei LiuShanghai Public Health Clinical Center and Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe efficient and accurate diagnosis of pulmonary adenocarcinoma before surgery is of considerable significance to clinicians. Although computed tomography (CT) examinations are widely used in practice, it is still challenging and time-consuming for radiologists to distinguish between different types of subcentimeter pulmonary nodules. Although there have been many deep learning algorithms proposed, their performance largely depends on vast amounts of data, which is difficult to collect in the medical imaging area. Therefore, we propose an automatic classification system for subcentimeter pulmonary adenocarcinoma, combining a convolutional neural network (CNN) and a generative adversarial network (GAN) to optimize clinical decision-making and to provide small dataset algorithm design ideas.

methodsA total of 206 nodules with postoperative pathological labels were analyzed. Among them were 30 adenocarcinomas in situ (AISs), 119 minimally invasive adenocarcinomas (MIAs), and 57 invasive adenocarcinomas (IACs). Our system consisted of two parts, a GAN-based image synthesis, and a CNN classification. First, several popular existing GAN techniques were employed to augment the datasets, and comprehensive experiments were conducted to evaluate the quality of the GAN synthesis. Additionally, our classification system processes were based on two-dimensional (2D) nodule-centered CT patches without the need of manual labeling information.

resultsFor GAN-based image synthesis, the visual Turing test showed that even radiologists could not tell the GAN-synthesized from the raw images (accuracy: primary radiologist 56%, senior radiologist 65%). For CNN classification, our progressive growing wGAN improved the performance of CNN most effectively (area under the curve =0.83). The experiments indicated that the proposed GAN augmentation method improved the classification accuracy by 23.5% (from 37.0% to 60.5%) and 7.3% (from 53.2% to 60.5%) in comparison with training methods using raw and common augmented images respectively. The performance of this combined GAN and CNN method (accuracy: 60.5%±2.6%) was comparable to the state-of-the-art methods, and our CNN was also more lightweight.

conclusionsThe experiments revealed that GAN synthesis techniques could effectively alleviate the problem of insufficient data in medical imaging. The proposed GAN plus CNN framework can be generalized for use in building other computer-aided detection (CADx) algorithms and thus assist in diagnosis.

Indexed as

computed tomographydata augmentationdeep convolutional neural networksgenerative adversarial network (GAN)Subcentimeter pulmonary adenocarcinoma diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID32550134
PMCPMC7276356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.