Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32549976›Full record

ArticleHealth information science and systems2020

RSMOTE: improving classification performance over imbalanced medical datasets.

Mehdi Naseriparsa, Ahmed Al-Shammari, Ming Sheng, Yong Zhang, Rui Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health information science and systems, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mehdi NaseriparsaSwinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Australia.
Ahmed Al-ShammariSwinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Australia.
Ming ShengTsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Yong ZhangTsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Rui ZhouSwinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMedical diagnosis is a crucial step for patient treatment. However, diagnosis is prone to bias due to imbalanced datasets. To overcome the imbalanced dataset problem, simple minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) was proposed that can generate new synthetic samples at data level to create the balance between minority and majority classes. However, the synthetic samples are generated on a random basis which causes class mixture problem; thus, resulting in deteriorating the classification performance and biased diagnosis. PURPOSE: In order to overcome the SMOTE shortcomings, some modified methods were proposed that try to generate synthetic samples along the line segment of selected minority samples. Most of these methods adopt one of the two policies for selecting minority samples to generate synthetic samples: borderline region sampling or safe region sampling. However, they both suffer from over-generalisation problem. We propose a modified SMOTE-based resampling method called RSMOTE to alleviate the medical imbalanced dataset problem. We provide an in-depth analysis and verify the performance of RSMOTE over imbalanced medical datasets.

methodsIn this paper, the proposed RSMOTE divides the minority sample domain into four regions (normal, semi-normal, semi-critical, and critical) based on the minority sample density analysis. RSMOTE discovers the minority sample region globally and applies the resampling near a specific group of samples.

resultsOur analysis and experiments verify that if synthetic samples are generated in the regions with high minority sample density, classification performance will be improved due to low risk of class mixture. Unlike some safe region methods, RSMOTE decides the region of minority samples on a global basis, thus removing the over-generalisation problem. Classic and additional evaluation metrics are considered to measure the effectiveness of the modified method: Recall, FP Rate, Precision, F-Measure, ROC area, and Average Aggregated Metric. We carried out experiments over various imbalanced medical datasets.

conclusionBased on the minority sample density analysis, we propose RSMOTE method that divides the minority sample domain into four regions. The proposed RSMOTE includes four re-sampling methods that each of them carries out resampling on a specific region. According to the experimental results, resampling on the regions with high minority sample density obtained better results while those with lower minority sample density got the inferior results. Thus, we conclude that the RSMOTE is a more flexible resampling method for the imbalanced medical datasets that is capable of generating samples with various minority sample densities.

Indexed as

Classification performanceClass mixtureImbalanced learningMedical diagnosisSMOTE

Identifiers

PMID32549976
PMCPMC7292850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.