ArticleJournal of child & adolescent trauma2020
Safe Place: Clinical Utility and Feasibility of a Multi-Disciplinary Intervention for Children with Sensory Processing Disorder and Complex Trauma - a Feasibility Study.
Article in Journal of child & adolescent trauma, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Feasibility of a randomized controlled trial of a proprioceptive and tactile vest intervention for children with challenges integrating and processing sensory information.BMC pediatrics · 2022Trial
- Promoting and Measuring Fidelity of Occupational Therapy Interventions: A Scoping Review.OTJR : occupation, participation and health · 2026Article
- Education strategies are the most commonly used in pediatric rehabilitation implementation research: a scoping review.Implementation science communications · 2025Article
- Sensory Processing Assessment and Feedback in the Treatment of Complex Developmental Trauma.Journal of child & adolescent trauma · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Issues of feasibility, acceptability, satisfaction, safety, and fidelity were examined in a single case program review as an initial step to assessment of the clinical utility of the SAFE PLACE program, a unique multi-disciplinary intervention program for children with complex trauma and sensory processing disorder. The feasibility of conducting a pilot intervention study was also examined. A mixed methods, single-case, program review was conducted. The intervention was the 12-week SAFE PLACE program with pre and post-intervention baseline periods. Random intervention sessions were assessed for fidelity. Post-program interviews and questionnaires were utilized to obtain qualitative and quantitative information on feasibility, acceptability, satisfaction, and safety. The SAFE PLACE fidelity measure demonstrated the intervention was safe and implemented with fidelity to the intervention model. The intervention was acceptable to the family with an average rating of 4.3 (between acceptable and perfectly acceptable) on a five-point scale. The family was very satisfied with the intervention and its outcomes with a rating of 4.75 (between satisfied and very satisfied). Numerous positive qualitative comments about participation in the program and outcomes of the intervention were spontaneously provided by the family. Staff satisfaction rating was 4.3. Scheduling, staffing and financial reimbursement feasibility challenges were identified. Preliminary outcomes of the intervention suggested positive results and provided guidance for selection of future clinical and research outcome measures. The SAFE PLACE intervention was found to be a safe, acceptable intervention with high caregiver satisfaction that could be delivered with fidelity. The program was deemed feasible for future research studies but scheduling, staffing and financial reimbursement challenges may inhibit implementation in routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.