ArticleCancer cell international2020
A novel risk score system of immune genes associated with prognosis in endometrial cancer.
Article in Cancer cell international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immune microenvironment and molecular mechanisms in endometrial cancer: implications for resistance and innovative treatments.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- The role of PSMC4 in non-small cell lung cancer: implications for prognosis, diagnosis, and immune microenvironment modulation.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Risk prediction model of uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma based on immune-related genes.BMC women's health · 2024Article
- Endometrioid Endometrial RNA Index Predicts Recurrence in Stage I Patients.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024Article
- Exploring COVID-19 causal genes through disease-specific Cis-eQTLs.Virus research · 2024Article
- Article
- PSMC4 promotes prostate carcinoma progression by regulating the CBX3-EGFR-PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2023Article
- Uncharacterized Proteins CxORFx: Subinteractome Analysis and Prognostic Significance in Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- The prognostic value of 19S ATPase proteasome subunits in acute myeloid leukemia and other forms of cancer.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Construction and validation of a novel prognostic model for lung squamous cell cancer based on N6-methyladenosine-related genes.World journal of surgical oncology · 2022Article
- Pan-cancer analysis identifies proteasome 26S subunit, ATPase (PSMC) family genes, and related signatures associated with prognosis, immune profile, and therapeutic response in lung adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Prognostic Values From Integrated Analysis of the Nomogram Based on RNA-Binding Proteins and Clinical Factors in Endometrial Cancer.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2022Article
- Genetic Cross-Talk between Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Type 2 Diabetes: The Potential Role of Immunity.Disease markers · 2022Article
- Detecting prognostic biomarkers of breast cancer by regularized Cox proportional hazards models.Journal of translational medicine · 2021Article
- Prognostic Biomarker-Based Identification of Drugs for Managing the Treatment of Endometrial Cancer.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2021Article
- Article
- A systematic analysis of a potential metabolism-related prognostic signature for breast cancer patients.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Article
- Comprehensive Analysis of ESRRA in Endometrial Cancer.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndometrial cancer was the commonest gynecological malignancy in developed countries. Despite striking advances in multimodality management, however, for patients in advanced stage, targeted therapy still remained a challenge. Our study aimed to investigate new biomarkers for endometrial cancer and establish a novel risk score system of immune genes in endometrial cancer.
methodsThe clinicopathological characteristics and gene expression data were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of immune genes between tumors and normal tissues were identified. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) network of immune genes and transcriptional factors was integrated and visualized in Cytoscape. Univariate and multivariate analysis were employed for key genes to establish a new risk score system. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and survival analysis were performed to investigate the prognostic value of the model. Association between clinical characteristics and the model was analyzed by logistic regression. For validation, we identified 34 patients with endometrial cancer from Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC). We detected 14-genes mRNA expression and calculated the risk scores of each patients and we performed survival analysis between the high-risk group and the low-risk group.
results23 normal tissues and 552 tumor tissues were obtained from TCGA database. 410 immune-related DEGs was identified by difference analysis and correlation analysis. KEGG and GO analysis revealed these DEGs were enriched in cell adhesion, chemotaxis, MAPK pathways and PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, which might regulate tumor progression and migration. All genes were screened for risk model construction and 14 hub immune-related genes (HTR3E, CBLC, TNF, PSMC4, TRAV30, PDIA3, FGF8, PDGFRA, ESRRA, SBDS, CRHR1, LTA, NR2F1, TNFRSF18) were prognostic in endometrial cancer. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.787 and the high-risk group estimated by the model possessed worse outcome (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis suggested that the model was indeed an independent prognostic factor (high-risk vs. low-risk, HR = 1.14, P < 0.001). Meanwhile, the high-risk group was prone to have higher grade (P = 0.002) and advanced clinical stage (P = 0.018). In FUSCC validation set, the high-risk group had worse survival than the low-risk group (P < 0.001).
conclusionsIn conclusion, the novel risk model of immune genes had some merits in predicting the prognosis of endometrial cancer and had strong correlation with clinical outcomes. Furthermore, it might provide new biomarkers for targeted therapy in endometrial cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.