Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32549663›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India

Clinical spectrum, diagnosis, and sexual dysfunction after repair of fracture penis: Is no news good news?

Aditya Prakash Sharma, Tushar Aditya Narain, Sudheer Kumar Devana, Shantanu Tyagi, Kalpesh M Parmar, Girdhar Singh Bora, Ravimohan S Mavuduru, Shrawan Kumar Singh

Open access · diamondAbstract readNews
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. What is inside?Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aditya Prakash SharmaDepartment of Urology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
Tushar Aditya NarainDepartment of Urology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
Sudheer Kumar DevanaDepartment of Urology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
Shantanu TyagiDepartment of Urology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
Kalpesh M ParmarDepartment of Urology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
Girdhar Singh BoraDepartment of Urology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
Ravimohan S MavuduruDepartment of Urology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
Shrawan Kumar SinghDepartment of Urology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPenile fracture is a rare urological emergency, best managed by early surgical intervention, but the data on subsequent sexual function is sparse. This study was designed to analyze the clinical spectrum and sexual function after penile fracture repair at our tertiary care center. MATERIALS AND

methodsAmbispective observational study was undertaken from July 2002 to August 2019 which included patients admitted with a history of trauma to the penis in the erect state. The clinical presentation, etiology and the details of the surgical management were noted. Patients were contacted telephonically and were called for follow-up. They were evaluated for the presence of penile nodules or curvature, and the erectile function was objectively recorded using the Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) questionnaire and the Erection Hardness Score (EHS).

resultsMedian age at injury was 37 years, and injury during the sexual intercourse (33/43) was the most common etiology. Five patients presented with blood at the meatus. Ultrasound was performed in 27 patients and could detect the injury with a 55% sensitivity. All but one case were repaired through a subcoronal degloving incision. At a median follow-up of 36 months, follow-up data of 20 patients were available. Of the 20 patients, 14 were sexually active. The mean SHIM score was 21.36 ± 1.33 and the mean EHS was 3.21 ± 0.43. Four of the 20 patients developed penile nodule while 2 of them had penile curvature which was not bothersome.

conclusionPenile fracture remains primarily a clinical diagnosis. Although prompt diagnosis and an emergent surgical exploration provides good outcomes in terms of preservation of erectile function, patients should be apprised about the problems of penile nodule and curvature.

Identifiers

PMID32549663
PMCPMC7279096
OpenAlexW3015390893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.