Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32549585›Full record

ArticleApplied physics letters2019

Upper limit for angular compounding speckle reduction.

Yonatan Winetraub, Chris Wu, Graham P Collins, Steven Chu, Adam de la Zerda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied physics letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. UnifiedAdvances in optics and photonics · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chris Wu
Steven Chu
Adam de la Zerda

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Angular compounding is a technique for reducing speckle noise in optical coherence tomography that is claimed to significantly improve the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of images without impairing their spatial resolution. Here, we examine how focal point movements caused by optical aberrations in an angular compounding system may produce unintended spatial averaging and concomitant loss of spatial resolution. Experimentally, we accounted for such aberrations by aligning our system and measuring distortions in images and found that when the distortions were corrected, the speckle reduction by angular compounding was limited. Our theoretical analysis using Monte Carlo simulations indicates that "pure" angular compounding (i.e., with no spatial averaging) over our full numerical aperture (13° in air) can improve the SNR by not more than a factor of 1.3. Illuminating only a partial aperture cannot improve this factor compared to a spatial averaging system with equivalent loss of resolution. We conclude that speckle reduction using angular compounding is equivalent to spatial averaging. Nonetheless, angular compounding may be useful for improving images in applications where the depth of field is important. The distortions tend to be the greatest off the focal plane, and so angular compounding combined with our correction technique can reduce speckle with a minimal loss of resolution across a large depth of field.

Identifiers

PMID32549585
PMCPMC7195867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.