ArticleApplied physics letters2019
Upper limit for angular compounding speckle reduction.
Article in Applied physics letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- One-transmission harmonic imaging with high spatial resolutions using probe consisting of two piezoelectric layer elements.Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) · 2026Article
- Noninvasive virtual biopsy using micro-registered optical coherence tomography (OCT) in human subjects.Science advances · 2024Article
- UnifiedAdvances in optics and photonics · 2021Article
- Adaptive compounding speckle-noise-reduction filter for optical coherence tomography images.Journal of biomedical optics · 2021Article
- Angular compounding for speckle reduction in optical coherence tomography using geometric image registration algorithm and digital focusing.Scientific reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Angular compounding is a technique for reducing speckle noise in optical coherence tomography that is claimed to significantly improve the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of images without impairing their spatial resolution. Here, we examine how focal point movements caused by optical aberrations in an angular compounding system may produce unintended spatial averaging and concomitant loss of spatial resolution. Experimentally, we accounted for such aberrations by aligning our system and measuring distortions in images and found that when the distortions were corrected, the speckle reduction by angular compounding was limited. Our theoretical analysis using Monte Carlo simulations indicates that "pure" angular compounding (i.e., with no spatial averaging) over our full numerical aperture (13° in air) can improve the SNR by not more than a factor of 1.3. Illuminating only a partial aperture cannot improve this factor compared to a spatial averaging system with equivalent loss of resolution. We conclude that speckle reduction using angular compounding is equivalent to spatial averaging. Nonetheless, angular compounding may be useful for improving images in applications where the depth of field is important. The distortions tend to be the greatest off the focal plane, and so angular compounding combined with our correction technique can reduce speckle with a minimal loss of resolution across a large depth of field.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.