Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32549301›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2020

Risk of Adverse Outcomes in Females Taking Oral Creatine Monohydrate: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Deborah L de Guingand, Kirsten R Palmer, Rodney J Snow, Miranda L Davies-Tuck, Stacey J Ellery

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07580846 (AssessmenT of thE Adherence of Nutritional Supplementation With Creatine Formula in Estrogen-Depleted Adult Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07580846 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

AssessmenT of thE Adherence of Nutritional Supplementation With Creatine Formula in Estrogen-Depleted Adult Women: Prospective Clinical Investigation

TypeobservationalSponsorMargan BiotechRan2026 to 2026Enrolled100ConditionsMenopause, Estrogen Deficiency
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Creatine in women's health: bridging the gap from menstruation through pregnancy to menopause.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Deborah L de GuingandThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne 3168, Australia.
Kirsten R PalmerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne 3168, Australia.
Rodney J SnowInstitute of Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Melbourne 3125, Australia.
Miranda L Davies-TuckThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne 3168, Australia.
Stacey J ElleryThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne 3168, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Creatine Monohydrate (CrM) is a dietary supplement routinely used as an ergogenic aid for sport and training, and as a potential therapeutic aid to augment different disease processes. Despite its increased use in recent years, studies reporting potential adverse outcomes of CrM have been mostly derived from male or mixed sex populations. A systematic search was conducted, which included female participants on CrM, where adverse outcomes were reported, with meta-analysis performed where appropriate. Six hundred and fifty-six studies were identified where creatine supplementation was the primary intervention; fifty-eight were female only studies (9%). Twenty-nine studies monitored for adverse outcomes, with 951 participants. There were no deaths or serious adverse outcomes reported. There were no significant differences in total adverse events, (risk ratio (RR) 1.24 (95% CI 0.51, 2.98)), gastrointestinal events, (RR 1.09 (95% CI 0.53, 2.24)), or weight gain, (mean difference (MD) 1.24 kg pre-intervention, (95% CI -0.34, 2.82)) to 1.37 kg post-intervention (95% CI -0.50, 3.23)), in CrM supplemented females, when stratified by dosing regimen and subject to meta-analysis. No statistically significant difference was reported in measures of renal or hepatic function. In conclusion, mortality and serious adverse events are not associated with CrM supplementation in females. Nor does the use of creatine supplementation increase the risk of total adverse outcomes, weight gain or renal and hepatic complications in females. However, all future studies of creatine supplementation in females should consider surveillance and comprehensive reporting of adverse outcomes to better inform participants and health professionals involved in future trials.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBody CompositionCreatineDietary SupplementsFemaleGastrointestinal DiseasesHumansLiver DiseasesMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentWeight GainYoung AdultCreatineadverse outcomescreatine monohydratefemalehumansafetysupplementation

Identifiers

PMID32549301
PMCPMC7353222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.