ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020
Long-Term Visual/Anatomic Outcome in Patients with Fovea-Involving Fibrovascular Pigment Epithelium Detachment Presenting Choroidal Neovascularization on Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Associations of presenting visual acuity with morphological changes on OCT in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: PRECISE Study Report 2.Eye (London, England) · 2024Article
- [Anti-VEGF-therapy of fibrovascular and serous-vascularized pigment epithelial detachment in neovascular AMD : A retrospective five-year-analysis].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2021Article
- Article
- Association between Early Anatomic Response and Intraocular Pressure Change after Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant: An Optical Coherence Tomography Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo evaluate long-term visual/anatomic outcome after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy in patients with fovea-involving fibrovascular pigment epithelium detachment (PED) presenting with choroidal neovascularization (CNV) on optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA).
methodsPatients with fibrovascular PED or subretinal CNV confirmed by OCTA who were treated by a relaxed treat-and-extend regimen for 2 years were retrospectively reviewed. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central subfield retinal thickness (CST) before and after anti-VEGF injection were analyzed. Furthermore, changes in photoreceptor layer (PRL) thickness and outer retinal bands in the fovea after injection were evaluated.
resultsA total of 31 eyes with fibrovascular PED and 24 eyes with subretinal CNV were included. Following a relaxed treat-and-extend regimen with anti-VEGF agents, BCVA and CST were improved, and the PRL thickness was decreased significantly. There were no differences in BCVA, CST, changes in PRL thickness, or the status of outer retinal bands between the groups. However, the difference in the amount of decrease in PRL thickness between the two groups was increased at 2 years, and the slope tended to be steeper in the subretinal CNV group.
conclusionsExudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) with fibrovascular PED or subretinal CNV showed good visual/anatomic outcomes after anti-VEGF treatment, regardless of the CNV type. By 2 years, fibrovascular PED did not have an additional protective effect on the outer retina, compared with subretinal CNV over 2 years. Further follow-up study might be needed to conclude that fibrovascular PED has a protective effect on the surrounding photoreceptor area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.