Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32549216›Full record

ReviewToxics2020

Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Neurotoxicity in Sentinel and Non-Traditional Laboratory Model Systems: Potential Utility in Predicting Adverse Outcomes in Human Health.

Rachel Foguth, Maria S Sepúlveda, Jason Cannon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Advances in ecotoxicological research using planarians: a comprehensive review.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2026
    Review
  2. Psychosocial distress among individuals residing in a rural PFAS-contaminated community.International journal of hygiene and environmental health · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Gas Phase Thermochemistry for Perfluoroalkyl Carboxylic Acids.The journal of physical chemistry. A · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. PFAS: exploration of neurotoxicity and environmental impact.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rachel FoguthSchool of Health Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Maria S SepúlvedaDepartment of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Jason CannonSchool of Health Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.

Funding

Ralph W. and Grace M. Showalter Research Trust Fund No number
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a class of chemicals that were widely used in manufacturing and are now present in the environment throughout the world. It is known that various PFAS are quantifiable in human in blood, but potential adverse health outcomes remain unclear. Sentinel and non-traditional model species are useful to study potential toxicity of PFAS in order to understand the relationship between environmental and human health. Here, we present a critical review of studies on the neurotoxicity of PFAS in sentinel and non-traditional laboratory model systems, including

Indexed as

per- and polyfluoroalkyl substancesperfluorobutane sulfonateperfluorooctane sulfonateperfluorooctanoatesentinel species

Identifiers

PMID32549216
PMCPMC7355795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.