Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32549206›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Oral Health Attitudes among Preclinical and Clinical Dental Students in Germany.

Mohamed Mekhemar, Jonas Conrad, Sameh Attia, Christof Dörfer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Dental Nurses' Mental Health in Germany: A Nationwide Survey during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. German Dentists' Preferences for the Treatment of Apical Periodontitis: A Cross-Sectional Survey.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohamed MekhemarClinic for Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, Christian Albrechts-University of Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, Haus B, 24105 Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4294-757X
Jonas ConradClinic for Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, Christian Albrechts-University of Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, Haus B, 24105 Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2516-3351
Sameh AttiaDepartment of Cranio Maxillofacial Surgery, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, Germany, Klinik Str. 33, 35392 Giessen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9174-6435
Christof DörferClinic for Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, Christian Albrechts-University of Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, Haus B, 24105 Kiel, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral health care providers are expected to show good examples of oral health behaviours and attitudes to their community. Previous studies displayed the constructive effect of dental education on oral hygiene manners of undergraduate students. The aim of this survey was to assess and compare aspects of oral health attitudes and behaviours between preclinical and clinical dental students in German universities. The German-language version of the HU-DBI was distributed to preclinical and clinical students from different German universities. Dichotomized (agree/disagree) responses to 20 HU-DBI items were provided in this study, with a maximum possible score of 19. A quantitative estimate of oral health attitudes and behaviours was provided by the total of appropriate answers given to every statement by each group. Data were analysed statistically. The overall mean score of answers favouring good oral hygiene was marginally higher in preclinical (14.62) than clinical students (14.31) but showed no statistical significance. Similarly, the analysis of each item individually displayed no statistically significant differences between preclinical and clinical participants, except in a single item of the survey. This study showed no effective differences in oral hygiene attitudes and behaviour between preclinical and clinical students in German universities. This reveals a weak effect of dental education on improving students' oral health attitudes in Germany and might demand the introduction of more courses emphasizing the importance of correct oral health behaviour of health care providers.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthOral HygieneStudents, DentalAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleGermanyHealth BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleOral HealthSurveys and Questionnairesdental studentsGermanyoral health attitudesoral hygiene

Identifiers

PMID32549206
PMCPMC7344414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.