Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32548787›Full record

ReviewOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2020

Identifying and managing osteoporosis before and after COVID-19: rise of the remote consultation?

Z Paskins, F Crawford-Manning, L Bullock, C Jinks

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Post-fracture care programs for prevention of subsequent fragility fractures: a literature assessment of current trends.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. How can the orthopedic surgeon ensure optimal vitamin D status in patients operated for an osteoporotic fracture?Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2021
    Review
  12. Anorexia nervosa: COVID-19 pandemic period (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021
    Review
  13. Virtual fracture liaison clinics in the COVID era: an initiative to maintain fracture prevention services during the pandemic associated with positive patient experience.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. How has COVID-19 affected the treatment of osteoporosis? An IOF-NOF-ESCEO global survey.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Z PaskinsSchool of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University & Haywood Academic Rheumatology Centre, Stoke-on-Trent, UK. z.paskins@keele.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7783-2986
F Crawford-ManningSchool of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University & Haywood Academic Rheumatology Centre, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
L BullockSchool of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4193-1835
C JinksSchool of Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Newcastle-under-Lyme, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3407-2446
Keele University · GB

Funding

Department of Health CS-2018-18-ST2-010National Institute for Health Research CS-2018-18-ST2-010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic is influencing methods of healthcare delivery. In this short review, we discuss the evidence for remote healthcare delivery in the context of osteoporosis.

introductionThe COVID-19 pandemic has undoubtedly had, and will continue to have, a significant impact on the lives of people living with, and at risk of, osteoporosis and those caring for them. With osteoporosis outpatient and Fracture Liaison Services on pause, healthcare organisations have already moved to delivering new and follow-up consultations remotely, where staffing permits, by telephone or video.

methodsIn this review, we consider different models of remote care delivery, the evidence for their use, and the possible implications of COVID-19 on osteoporosis services.

resultsTelemedicine is a global term used to describe any use of telecommunication systems to deliver healthcare from a distance and encompasses a range of different scenarios from remote clinical data transfer to remote clinician-patient interactions. Across a range of conditions and contexts, there remains unclear evidence on the acceptability of telemedicine and the effect on healthcare costs. Within the context of osteoporosis management, there is some limited evidence to suggest telemedicine approaches are acceptable to patients but unclear evidence on whether telemedicine approaches support informed drug adherence. Gaps in the evidence pertain to the acceptability and benefits of using telemedicine in populations with hearing, cognitive, or visual impairments and in those with limited health literacy.

conclusionThere is an urgent need for further health service evaluation and research to address the impact of remote healthcare delivery during COVID-19 outbreak on patient care, and in the longer term, to identify acceptability and cost- and clinical-effectiveness of remote care delivery on outcomes of relevance to people living with osteoporosis.

Indexed as

Coronavirus InfectionsOsteoporosisPandemicsPneumonia, ViralRemote ConsultationBetacoronavirusCOVID-19Delivery of Health CareHealth Care CostsHumansSARS-CoV-2TelemedicineTelephoneCOVID-19FLSOsteoporosisTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID32548787
PMCPMC7297512
OpenAlexW3034326840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.