Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32548734›Full record

ArticleEndocrine2020

High biochemical recurrence rate after withdrawal of cabergoline in prolactinomas: is it necessary to restart treatment?

Etual Espinosa-Cárdenas, Miriam Sánchez-García, Claudia Ramírez-Rentería, Victoria Mendoza-Zubieta, Ernesto Sosa-Eroza, Moises Mercado

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Approach to the Patient With Prolactinoma.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Aggressive prolactinoma (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2022
    Review
  7. Treatment of hyperprolactinemia: A single-institute experience.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Etual Espinosa-CárdenasServicio de Endocrinologia, Hospital de Especialidades, UMAE Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, IMSS, Ciudad de México, Mexico.
Miriam Sánchez-GarcíaServicio de Endocrinologia, Hospital de Especialidades, UMAE Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, IMSS, Ciudad de México, Mexico.
Claudia Ramírez-RenteríaUIM en Enfermedades Endócrinas, Hospital de Especialidades, UMAE Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, IMSS, Ciudad de México, Mexico.
Victoria Mendoza-ZubietaServicio de Endocrinologia, Hospital de Especialidades, UMAE Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, IMSS, Ciudad de México, Mexico.
Ernesto Sosa-ErozaServicio de Endocrinologia, Hospital de Especialidades, UMAE Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, IMSS, Ciudad de México, Mexico. esosae@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3459-923X
Moises MercadoUIM en Enfermedades Endócrinas, Hospital de Especialidades, UMAE Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, IMSS, Ciudad de México, Mexico.
Centro Medico Nacional Siglo XXI · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTreatment with dopamine agonists (DA) is highly effective in patients with prolactinomas. In selected patients, discontinuation of DA after several years of successful treatment is possible, however, hyperprolactinemia recurs in 60-80% of them. It is unclear what is the clinical significance of these recurrences and hence, whether or not reinitiation of therapy is necessary.

objectivesTo evaluate the recurrence rate in prolactinoma patients after DA withdrawal and the necessity to restart treatment.

methodsPatients with >2 years of treatment with cabergoline (CBG) who achieved normoprolactinemia and a > 50% reduction in tumor size were included. DA dose was down titrated until withdrawal. Basal tumor size, as well as PRL and gonadal steroid levels were recorded at diagnosis, at withdrawal of DA and every 3-6 months for 1-3 years.

resultsFifty patients were included (38 women, 34 macroprolactinomas). After withdrawal, 34 (68%) presented recurrence of hyperprolactinemia. PRL levels <5 ng/mL at the time of withdrawal predicted remission (sensitivity 76%, specificity of 63%). CBG was restarted in eight patients (23%) because of the presence of hypogonadism. CBG was withheld in the remaining 26, based on the following arguments: (1) premenopausal women without biochemical hypogonadism, (54%); (2) asymptomatic men under 65 without biochemical hypogonadism (19%); (3) asymptomatic postmenopausal women (19%); (4) asymptomatic men over 65 (8%). After a median follow-up of 30 months, no increase in PRL levels or tumor growth was documented.

conclusionsBiochemical recurrence in prolactinomas is very frequent, however, in only a few of these patients reinitiation of DA is necessary.

Indexed as

CabergolinePituitary NeoplasmsProlactinomaDopamine AgonistsErgolinesFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProlactinCabergolineDopamine AgonistsErgolinesProlactinCabergolineDopamine agonist withdrawalHypogonadismProlactinProlactinoma

Identifiers

PMID32548734
OpenAlexW3034457963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.