Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32548678›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2020

The association between acid-suppressive agent use and the risk of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hyun Jin Song, Nakyung Jeon, Patrick Squires

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Intake of Proton-Pump Inhibitors and Gastric Cancer within the Stomach Cancer Pooling (StoP) Project.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hyun Jin SongDepartment of Pharmaceutical Policy and Outcomes Research, School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, South Korea. hyunjin.song@cop.ufl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4779-6555
Nakyung JeonCollege of Pharmacy, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, South Korea.
Patrick SquiresDepartment of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, HPNP Building Room 2320, 1225 Center Drive, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.
Chonnam National University · KRSungkyunkwan University · KRUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

Sungkyunkwan University 2017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcid-suppressive agents (ASAs) may be associated with cancer; previous studies reported that the risk of cancer with acid suppressants has differed depending on the site of cancer. Here, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between ASA use and the type of cancer risk.

methodsMEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases were searched for publications up to the end of September 2019 for MeSH terms and text words related to cancer and ASAs. Studies on the association between ASAs and cancer risk, which included a control group and reported the relative risk of cancer, were included. The inverse-variance random effect model was used to estimate the pooled relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI), and subgroup analysis for type of acid suppressants, drug uptake duration, and cumulative doses was performed. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I

resultsThirty-nine cohort and case-control studies were included. ASA use was found to be significantly associated with a 46% higher risk of gastric cancer (RR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.18-1.80) and a 53% higher risk of liver cancer (RR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.31-1.78) compared with nonuse; however, there was no significant association for esophageal, colorectal, pancreatic, lung, breast, prostate, and kidney cancer; melanoma; and lymphoma.

conclusionsASAs were significantly associated with an increased risk of gastric and liver cancer; therefore, special attention of ASA use considering the potential risk of gastric and liver cancer is needed.

Indexed as

Histamine H2 AntagonistsHumansLiver NeoplasmsNeoplasmsProton Pump InhibitorsStomach NeoplasmsHistamine H2 AntagonistsProton Pump InhibitorsAcid-suppressive agentCancerHistamine 2-receptor antagonistMeta-analysisProton pump inhibitorSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32548678
OpenAlexW3035333382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.