Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32548677›Full record

ReviewCurrent allergy and asthma reports2020

Sublingual Versus Subcutaneous Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinitis: What Are the Important Therapeutic and Real-World Considerations?

Kelsey Field, Michael S Blaiss

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current allergy and asthma reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02478398 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase III, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Efficacy and Safety of MK-3641, a Ragweed (Ambrosia Artemisiifolia) Sublingual Immunotherapy Tablet, in Children With a History of Ragweed-Induced Rhinoconjunctivitis With or Without Asthma

TypeinterventionalSponsorMerck Sharp & Dohme LLCRan2015 to 2018Enrolled1,025ConditionsRhinitis, Allergic, SeasonalArmsShort ragweed pollen allergen extract, Placebo, Self-injectable epinephrine, Albuterol/Salbutamol, Loratadine
NCT04145219 phase3completednot on this map

A One-year Placebo-controlled Phase III Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of the House Dust Mite (HDM) SLIT-tablet in Children (5-11 Years of Age) With HDM Allergic Rhinitis/Rhinoconjunctivitis With or Without Asthma

TypeinterventionalSponsorALK-Abelló A/SRan2019 to 2023Enrolled1,460ConditionsAllergic Rhinitis Due to Dermatophagoides Farinae, Allergic Rhinitis Due to Dermatophagoides Pteronyssinus, Allergic Rhinitis Due to House Dust MiteArmsSublingual allergy immunotherapy tablet, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. [Compliance and withdraw reason of sublingual immunotherapy in 245 patients with allergic rhinitis].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kelsey FieldMedical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA.
Michael S BlaissMedical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA. michael.blaiss@gmail.com.
Augusta University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewAllergen immunotherapy has been used for over 100 years in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. With two major options for administering this disease-modifying therapy, SCIT, and SLIT, what is our current understanding of the efficacy and safety of each one? How do we determine who is the appropriate candidate for each one in the real world? RECENT

findingsSCIT and SLIT show significant improvement in clinical symptoms and need for medication in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. In recent meta-analyses, there is no significant difference in the efficacy between the two treatments, but SLIT has more local side effects though less systemic ones. Shared decision-making should be instituted to determine which treatment should be started in a patient with allergic rhinitis. This review provides up-to-date information on the efficacy and safety of SCIT vs SLIT in the care of children and adults with allergic rhinitis in the real world and the role of shared decision-making in the use of these modalities. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04145219 and NCT02478398.

Indexed as

Desensitization, ImmunologicHumansInjections, SubcutaneousRhinitis, AllergicSublingual ImmunotherapyAllergen immunotherapyAllergic rhinitisShared decision makingSubcutaneous immunotherapySublingual immunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID32548677
OpenAlexW3034408594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.