Trial reportEuropean heart journal2020
Long-term clinical outcomes of losartan in patients with Marfan syndrome: follow-up of the multicentre randomized controlled COMPARE trial.
Trial report in European heart journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.
- The aorta in Marfan syndrome: from molecular mechanisms to mechanobiological dysfunction.Cardiovascular research · 2026Review
- Article
- Losartan shows limited benefit in preclinical models of Geleophysic dysplasia.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Inherited aortopathies and risk of aortic dissection and aortic syndrome in pregnancy.Obstetric medicine · 2026Review
- Genetic Causes of Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm: A Review.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2026Review
- Co-produced evidence-based recommendations for cascade screening and secondary prevention in the relatives of people diagnosed with non-syndromic thoracic aortic disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Calcium channel blockers increase the risk of aortic aneurysm and dissection.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Phenotype-driven clustering of ocular manifestations reveals prognostic and genetic heterogeneity in Marfan syndrome: a real-world longitudinal cohort study.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Role of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers on Cardiovascular Protection in Marfan Syndrome: A Literature Review.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Therapeutic Opportunities of Marfan Syndrome: Current Perspectives.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Review
- Complement C3a/C3aR inhibition alleviates the formation of aortic aneurysm in Marfan syndrome mice.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Article
- Aorta pathology and pregnancy-related risks in adult congenital cardiac disease: does the aorta dilate during pregnancy?Obstetric medicine · 2024Article
- Understanding genomic medicine for thoracic aortic disease through the lens of induced pluripotent stem cells.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Precision medicine in monogenic inflammatory bowel disease: proposed mIBD REPORT standards.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2023Review
- Prophylactic effect of angiotensin receptor blockers in children with genetic aortopathies: the early bird catches the worm.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2023Article
- Pathology and pathophysiology of the aortic root.Annals of cardiothoracic surgery · 2023Review
- LRP1 protects against excessive superior mesenteric artery remodeling by modulating angiotensin II-mediated signaling.JCI insight · 2023Article
- A cross-sectional study on fatigue, anxiety, and symptoms of depression and their relation with medical status in adult patients with Marfan syndrome. Psychological consequences in Marfan syndrome.Clinical genetics · 2022Article
- Repurposing drugs to treat cardiovascular disease in the era of precision medicine.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2022Review
- [Naringenin inhibits thoracic aortic aneurysm formation in mice with Marfan syndrome].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThe COMPARE trial showed a small but significant beneficial effect of 3-year losartan treatment on aortic root dilatation rate in adults with Marfan syndrome (MFS). However, no significant effect was found on clinical endpoints, possibly due to a short follow-up period. The aim of the current study was therefore to investigate the long-term clinical outcomes after losartan treatment. METHODS AND
resultsIn the original COMPARE study (inclusion 2008-2009), adult patients with MFS (n = 233) were randomly allocated to either the angiotensin-II receptor blocker losartan® on top of regular treatment (β-blockers in 71% of the patients) or no additional medication. After the COMPARE trial period of 3 years, study subjects chose to continue their losartan medication or not. In a median follow-up period of 8 years, 75 patients continued losartan medication, whereas 78 patients, originally allocated to the control group, never used losartan after inclusion. No differences existed between baseline characteristics of the two groups except for age at inclusion [losartan 34 (interquartile range, IQR 26-43) years, control 41 (IQR 30-52) years; P = 0.031], and β-blocker use (losartan 81%, control 64%; P = 0.022). A pathological FBN1 mutation was present in 76% of patients and 58% of the patients were male. Clinical endpoints, defined as all-cause mortality, aortic dissection/rupture, elective aortic root replacement, reoperation, and vascular graft implantation beyond the aortic root, were compared between the two groups. A per-patient composite endpoint was also analysed. Five deaths, 14 aortic dissections, 23 aortic root replacements, 3 reoperations, and 3 vascular graft implantations beyond the aortic root occurred during follow-up. Except for aortic root replacement, all endpoints occurred in patients with an operated aortic root. Patients who used losartan during the entire follow-up period showed a reduced number of events compared to the control group (death: 0 vs. 5, P = 0.014; aortic dissection: 3 vs. 11, P = 0.013; elective aortic root replacement: 10 vs. 13, P = 0.264; reoperation: 1 vs. 2, P = 0.463; vascular graft implantations beyond the aortic root 0 vs. 3, P = 0.071; and composite endpoint: 14 vs. 26, P = 0.019). These results remained similar when corrected for age and β-blocker use in a multivariate analysis.
conclusionThese results suggest a clinical benefit of combined losartan and β-blocker treatment in patients with MFS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.