Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32548624›Full record

Trial reportEuropean heart journal2020

Long-term clinical outcomes of losartan in patients with Marfan syndrome: follow-up of the multicentre randomized controlled COMPARE trial.

Mitzi M van Andel, Reza Indrakusuma, Hamid Jalalzadeh, Ron Balm, Janneke Timmermans, Arthur J Scholte, Maarten P van den Berg, Aeilko H Zwinderman, Barbara J M Mulder, Vivian de Waard and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European heart journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Genetic Causes of Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm: A Review.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Prophylactic effect of angiotensin receptor blockers in children with genetic aortopathies: the early bird catches the worm.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2023
    Article
  16. Pathology and pathophysiology of the aortic root.Annals of cardiothoracic surgery · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. [Naringenin inhibits thoracic aortic aneurysm formation in mice with Marfan syndrome].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mitzi M van AndelDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Reza IndrakusumaDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hamid JalalzadehDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ron BalmDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Janneke TimmermansDepartment of Cardiology, St. Radboud University Medical Center, Geert grooteplein 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Arthur J ScholteDepartment of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 AZ, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Maarten P van den BergDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
Aeilko H ZwindermanDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Barbara J M MulderDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Vivian de WaardDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maarten GroeninkDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe COMPARE trial showed a small but significant beneficial effect of 3-year losartan treatment on aortic root dilatation rate in adults with Marfan syndrome (MFS). However, no significant effect was found on clinical endpoints, possibly due to a short follow-up period. The aim of the current study was therefore to investigate the long-term clinical outcomes after losartan treatment. METHODS AND

resultsIn the original COMPARE study (inclusion 2008-2009), adult patients with MFS (n = 233) were randomly allocated to either the angiotensin-II receptor blocker losartan® on top of regular treatment (β-blockers in 71% of the patients) or no additional medication. After the COMPARE trial period of 3 years, study subjects chose to continue their losartan medication or not. In a median follow-up period of 8 years, 75 patients continued losartan medication, whereas 78 patients, originally allocated to the control group, never used losartan after inclusion. No differences existed between baseline characteristics of the two groups except for age at inclusion [losartan 34 (interquartile range, IQR 26-43) years, control 41 (IQR 30-52) years; P = 0.031], and β-blocker use (losartan 81%, control 64%; P = 0.022). A pathological FBN1 mutation was present in 76% of patients and 58% of the patients were male. Clinical endpoints, defined as all-cause mortality, aortic dissection/rupture, elective aortic root replacement, reoperation, and vascular graft implantation beyond the aortic root, were compared between the two groups. A per-patient composite endpoint was also analysed. Five deaths, 14 aortic dissections, 23 aortic root replacements, 3 reoperations, and 3 vascular graft implantations beyond the aortic root occurred during follow-up. Except for aortic root replacement, all endpoints occurred in patients with an operated aortic root. Patients who used losartan during the entire follow-up period showed a reduced number of events compared to the control group (death: 0 vs. 5, P = 0.014; aortic dissection: 3 vs. 11, P = 0.013; elective aortic root replacement: 10 vs. 13, P = 0.264; reoperation: 1 vs. 2, P = 0.463; vascular graft implantations beyond the aortic root 0 vs. 3, P = 0.071; and composite endpoint: 14 vs. 26, P = 0.019). These results remained similar when corrected for age and β-blocker use in a multivariate analysis.

conclusionThese results suggest a clinical benefit of combined losartan and β-blocker treatment in patients with MFS.

Indexed as

Aortic DissectionLosartanMarfan SyndromeAdultAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleTreatment OutcomeAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersLosartanAngiotensin-II receptor blockerLosartanMarfan syndromeβ-blocker

Identifiers

PMID32548624
PMCPMC7711887
OpenAlexW3034456007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.