Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32548546›Full record

ReviewResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2020

Bispecific Antibodies and Advances in Non-Gene Therapy Options in Hemophilia.

Midori Shima

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Synthesis of Bispecific Conjugates by ADP-Ribosyl Cyclases.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. From a bispecific monoclonal antibody to gene therapy: A new era in the treatment of hemophilia A.Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. The lived experience of a novel disruptive therapy in a group of men and boys with haemophilia A with inhibitors: Emi & Me.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  7. Disruptive technology and hemophilia care: The multiple impacts of emicizumab.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2021
    Article
  8. Making friends out of foes: novel therapeutic approaches for haemophilia.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2021
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Bispecific Antibodies and Advances in Non-Gene Therapy Options in Hemophilia.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Midori ShimaThrombosis and Hemostasis Research Center Nara Medical University Kashihara City Nara Japan.
Nara Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regular prophylaxis has markedly improved the treatment for patients with hemophilia A, especially after the introduction of highly purified factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates. However, frequent intravenous infusions and the development of FVIII inhibitors remain as unsolved difficulties. To overcome these unmet needs, a bispecific antibody mimicking activated FVIII has been developed in Japan. This bispecific antibody, emicizumab, recognizes activated factor IX (FIXa) and activated factor X (FXa), and promotes FIXa-catalyzed activation of FX in the absence of FVIII. Emicizumab initially reacts with FIXa generated by the action of factor VIIa/tissue factor complexes. Subsequently, thrombin generation is enhanced in the presence of higher amounts of FIXa derived from FXIa-dependent mechanisms. Hence, emicizumab-driven FXa and thrombin generation is maintained by a FXI activation loop in the intrinsic coagulation pathway. Reactions downstream of emicizumab are regulated by natural anticoagulants including activated protein C, antithrombin, and tissue factor pathway inhibitor. Phase 3 studies (HAVEN 1-4 and HOHOEMI studies) demonstrated a remarkable reduction in bleeding rates together with a high percentage of patients with zero treated bleeds irrespective of the presence of inhibitors. In general, emicizumab proved to be well tolerated, although isolated thromboembolic and thrombotic microangiopathic complications were observed in the HAVEN 1 studies, and 3 out of a total of 400 patients developed neutralizing antidrug antibodies. In addition, several questions remain to be discussed with respect to open-use clinical practice, including when to start treatment, how to monitor therapy, and optimum dosage for surgical procedures and immune tolerance induction.

Indexed as

bispecific antibodiesemicizumabfactor VIII prophylaxishemophilia A therapy

Identifiers

PMID32548546
PMCPMC7292667
OpenAlexW3021812684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.