ArticleACS omega2020
Development and Verification of an Economical Method of Custom Target Library Construction.
Article in ACS omega, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Age Group Classification of Dental Radiography without Precise Age Information Using Convolutional Neural Networks.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- DENSEN: a convolutional neural network for estimating chronological ages from panoramic radiographs.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although technological advances have greatly reduced the cost of DNA sequencing, sample preparation time and reagent costs remain the limiting factors for many studies. Based on low-cost targeted amplification, we developed an economical method for custom target library construction based on DNA nanoball (DNB) technology and two-step polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Here, we refer to this method as the two-step PCR, which was compared to traditional multiplex PCR methods in three aspects, data quality, efficiency, and specificity to humans. The results confirmed that two-step PCR reduces to finishing 128 sequencing libraries in only 2 h 24 min 59 s of the total PCR time and at a data utilization rate of 0.44 at a cost of approximately $1.70 per sample for targeted sequencing via the two-step PCR. The replacement of traditional multiplex PCR methods with this strategy makes the sample preparation process before sequencing relatively more cost-effective and further reduces the cost of next-generation sequencing (NGS). This method may also be free from the interference of other species and the limitations of sample type and DNA content. These findings reveal possibilities for broad applications of this approach in forensic research.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.