Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32548379›Full record

ArticleACS omega2020

Cytokinesis-Block Micronucleus Assay Using Human Lymphocytes as a Sensitive Tool for Cytotoxicity/Genotoxicity Evaluation of AgNPs.

Balam Ruiz-Ruiz, María Evarista Arellano-García, Patricia Radilla-Chávez, David Sergio Salas-Vargas, Yanis Toledano-Magaña, Francisco Casillas-Figueroa, Roberto Luna Vazquez-Gomez, Alexey Pestryakov, Juan Carlos García-Ramos, Nina Bogdanchikova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Genotoxicity of nanoparticles evaluated using theJournal of environmental science and health. Part C, Toxicology and carcinogenesis · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Treatment with ArgovitNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Balam Ruiz-RuizLaboratorio de Genotoxicología Ambiental, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, C.P. 22860 Ensenada, Baja California, México.
María Evarista Arellano-GarcíaLaboratorio de Genotoxicología Ambiental, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, C.P. 22860 Ensenada, Baja California, México.
Patricia Radilla-ChávezEscuela de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, C.P. 22890 Ensenada, Baja California, México.
David Sergio Salas-VargasEscuela de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, C.P. 22890 Ensenada, Baja California, México.
Yanis Toledano-MagañaEscuela de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, C.P. 22890 Ensenada, Baja California, México.
Francisco Casillas-FigueroaEscuela de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, C.P. 22890 Ensenada, Baja California, México.
Roberto Luna Vazquez-GomezEscuela de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, C.P. 22890 Ensenada, Baja California, México.
Alexey PestryakovDepartment of Technology of Organic Substances and Polymer Materials, Tomsk Polytechnic University, 634050 Tomsk, Russia.
Juan Carlos García-RamosEscuela de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, C.P. 22890 Ensenada, Baja California, México.
Nina BogdanchikovaCentro de Nanociencias y Nanotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, C.P. 22879 Ensenada, Baja California, México.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) are the most used nanomaterials worldwide due to their excellent antibacterial, antiviral, and antitumor activities, among others. However, there is scarce information regarding their genotoxic potential measured using human peripheral blood lymphocytes. In this work, we present the cytotoxic and genotoxic behavior of two commercially available poly(vinylpyrrolidone)-coated silver nanoparticle (PVP-AgNPs) formulations that can be identified as noncytotoxic and nongenotoxic by just evaluating micronuclei (MNi) induction and the mitotic index, but present enormous differences when other parameters such as cytostasis, apoptosis, necrosis, and nuclear damage (nuclear buds (NBUDs) and nucleoplasmic bridges (NPBs)) are analyzed. The results show that Argovit (35 nm PVP-AgNPs) and nanoComposix (50 nm PVP-AgNPs), at concentrations from 0.012 to 12 μg/mL, produce no changes in the nuclear division index (NDI) or micronuclei (MNi) frequency compared with the values found on control cultures of human blood peripheral lymphocytes from a healthy donor. Still, 50 nm PVP-AgNPs significantly decrease the replication index and significantly increase cytostasis, apoptosis, necrosis, and the frequencies of nuclear buds (NBUDs) and nucleoplasmic bridges (NPBs). These results provide evidence that the cytokinesis-block micronucleus (CBMN) assay using human lymphocytes and evaluating the eight parameters provided by the technique is a sensitive, fast, accurate, and inexpensive detection tool to support or discard AgNPs or other nanomaterials, which is worthwhile for continued testing of their effectiveness and toxicity for biomedical applications. In addition, it provides very important information about the role played by the [coating agent]/[metal] ratio in the design of nanomaterials that could reduce adverse effects as much as possible while retaining their therapeutic capabilities.

Identifiers

PMID32548379
PMCPMC7271025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.