ArticleTobacco prevention & cessation2020
Associations between Appalachian youth tobacco consumption and communication channel use.
Article in Tobacco prevention & cessation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding smokeless tobacco use in rural United States: A narrative synthesis of contributing factors and prevention efforts.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2026Review
- Social media and use of electronic nicotine delivery systems among school-going adolescents in a rural distressed Appalachian community.Preventive medicine reports · 2022Article
- Exploring Associations between Susceptibility to the Use of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems and E-Cigarette Use among School-Going Adolescents in Rural Appalachia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Sociodemographic differences in single, dual, and poly tobacco use among Appalachian youth.Tobacco prevention & cessation · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionYouth tobacco use rates in Appalachia exceed the US national average, and e-cigarette use has increased. Thus, further research is needed to understand how these youth receive and share product information.
methodsMiddle and high school students in rural Appalachia were surveyed (N=1103). The primary outcome, tobacco use, was categorized as: never users, cigarette-only users, smokeless-only users, e-cigarette-only users, and polytobacco users. Associations between receiving or sharing conventional tobacco-related or e-cigarette-related information via specific communication channels and tobacco use were assessed.
resultsParticipants who received tobacco information from friends and family (FF) (OR=1.87; 95% CI: 1.35-2.57), public displays (PUB) (OR=1.49; 95% CI: 1.09-2.05), and digital media (DIG) (OR=1.95; 95% CI: 1.41-2.70) and e-cigarette information via the same communication channels, FF (OR=2.65; 95% CI: 1.93-3.65), PUB (OR=1.62; 95% CI: 1.17-2.26), and DIG (OR=2.24; 95% CI: 1.61-3.12), had greater odds of being polytobacco users, compared to never users. Participants who received e-cigarette-related information from FF (OR=2.42; 95% CI: 1.42-4.13) and PUB (OR=2.13; 95% CI: 1.25-3.65) had greater odds of being e-cigarette-only users compared to never users. Participants who shared e-cigarette-related information with FF had greater odds of being e-cigarette-only users (OR=3.16; 95% CI: 1.80-5.58) and polytobacco users (OR=4.48; 95% CI: 3.16-6.35) compared to never users.
conclusionsReceiving and sharing tobacco-related and e-cigarette-related information via multiple communication channels is associated with e-cigarette and polytobacco use among Appalachian youth. Several channels may need to be utilized in health campaigns to influence youth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.