Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32548357›Full record

ArticleTobacco prevention & cessation2020

Relationship between population characteristics, e-cigarette and tobacco-related perceptions, and likelihood of ever using e-cigarettes.

Jack A Pfeiffer, Lindsay K Tompkins, Joy L Hart, Anshula Kesh, Allison Groom, Thanh-Huyen T Vu, Jennie Z Ma, Robyn Landry, Thomas J Payne, Aida L Giachello and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco prevention & cessation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Policy influences on adolescent risk perceptions of vaping.Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Influence of Friends on Teen Vaping: A Mixed-Methods Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jack A PfeifferDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States.
Lindsay K TompkinsDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States.
Joy L HartChristina Lee Brown Envirome Institute, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States.
Anshula KeshAmerican Heart Association, Tobacco Regulation and Addiction Center, Dallas, United States.
Allison GroomAmerican Heart Association, Tobacco Regulation and Addiction Center, Dallas, United States.
Thanh-Huyen T VuAmerican Heart Association, Tobacco Regulation and Addiction Center, Dallas, United States.
Jennie Z MaAmerican Heart Association, Tobacco Regulation and Addiction Center, Dallas, United States.
Robyn LandryAmerican Heart Association, Tobacco Regulation and Addiction Center, Dallas, United States.
Thomas J PayneAmerican Heart Association, Tobacco Regulation and Addiction Center, Dallas, United States.
Aida L GiachelloAmerican Heart Association, Tobacco Regulation and Addiction Center, Dallas, United States.
Rose Marie RobertsonAmerican Heart Association, Tobacco Regulation and Addiction Center, Dallas, United States.
Kandi L WalkerChristina Lee Brown Envirome Institute, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionElectronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) are a relatively new type of nicotine-containing product that has risen greatly in use within the past decade, displacing conventional tobacco products as the dominant source of nicotine exposure by many groups. Among those impacted are large sections of US youth. Though health outcomes associated with ENDS use are still being assessed, several potential harms have been noted in the extant literature. The purpose of this study is to examine which US youth subpopulations are at greatest risk for ENDS ever use and how perceptions pertaining to nicotine-containing products relate to this risk.

methodsA nationwide online survey was administered to US youth ENDS users and non-users aged 13-18 years. A total weighted sample of 2501 participants was obtained. Statistical analyses included binomial logistic regression and a likelihood ratio test.

resultsOf these youth, 1346 (53.8%) reported having ever used an ENDS product. Those most likely to have used ENDS were White males in their late teens. Those who reported ever using a conventional tobacco product were much more likely to have reported ever using ENDS (AOR= 19.96; 95% CI: 15.30-26.05). A number of perceptions related to nicotine-containing products, including product safety and health effects, were significantly associated with an increased likelihood of ENDS use.

conclusionsCertain sections of the US youth population have elevated odds of being ENDS ever users. As increasing evidence supports the need to combat ENDS use by youth, effectively targeted education and prevention campaigns will be necessary.

Indexed as

electronic cigarettee-nicotinerisk of tobacco usetobaccotobacco perceptionsvaping

Identifiers

PMID32548357
PMCPMC7291885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.