ArticleTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2020
Deep Feature Stability Analysis Using CT Images of a Physical Phantom Across Scanner Manufacturers, Cartridges, Pixel Sizes, and Slice Thickness.
Article in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Voxel Normalization in LDCT Imaging: Its Significance in Texture Feature Selection for Pulmonary Nodule Malignancy Classification: Insights from Two Centers.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluating the robustness of features generated by a foundation model from CT with different reconstruction parameters.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2025Article
- Optimization and validation of voxel size-related radiomics variability by combatting batch effect harmonization in pulmonary nodules: a phantom and clinical study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Rim Enhancement after Technically Successful Transarterial Chemoembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Potential Mimic of Incomplete Embolization or Reactive Hyperemia?Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2022Article
- Stability of Radiomic Features across Different Region of Interest Sizes-A CT and MR Phantom Study.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2021Article
- Understanding Sources of Variation to Improve the Reproducibility of Radiomics.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Review of Value of CT Texture Analysis and Machine Learning in Differentiating Fat-Poor Renal Angiomyolipoma from Renal Cell Carcinoma.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2020Review
- Quantitative Imaging Enters the Clinical Arena: A Personal Viewpoint.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Image acquisition parameters for computed tomography scans such as slice thickness and field of view may vary depending on tumor size and site. Recent studies have shown that some radiomics features were dependent on voxel size (= pixel size × slice thickness), and with proper normalization, this voxel size dependency could be reduced. Deep features from a convolutional neural network (CNN) have shown great promise in characterizing cancers. However, how do these deep features vary with changes in imaging acquisition parameters? To analyze the variability of deep features, a physical radiomics phantom with 10 different material cartridges was scanned on 8 different scanners. We assessed scans from 3 different cartridges (rubber, dense cork, and normal cork). Deep features from the penultimate layer of the CNN before (pre-rectified linear unit) and after (post-rectified linear unit) applying the rectified linear unit activation function were extracted from a pre-trained CNN using transfer learning. We studied both the interscanner and intrascanner dependency of deep features and also the deep features' dependency over the 3 cartridges. We found some deep features were dependent on pixel size and that, with appropriate normalization, this dependency could be reduced. False discovery rate was applied for multiple comparisons, to mitigate potentially optimistic results. We also used stable deep features for prognostic analysis on 1 non-small cell lung cancer data set.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.