Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32548215›Full record

ArticleBone reports2020

Romosozumab was not effective in preventing multiple spontaneous clinical vertebral fractures after denosumab discontinuation: A case report.

Masafumi Kashii, Kosuke Ebina, Kazuma Kitaguchi, Hideki Yoshikawa

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Bone reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06720350 (Efficacy of Romosozumab and Denosumab Combined Treatment in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis Patients with Multiple Fragility Fractures), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06720350 phase4not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of Romosozumab and Denosumab Combined Treatment in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis Patients with Multiple Fragility Fractures

TypeinterventionalSponsorMarmara UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled60ConditionsOsteoporosis in Post-menopausal WomenArmsRomosozumab and Denosumab Combination Therapy, Romosozumab Prefilled Syringe [Evenity], Denosumab (Prolia)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Romosozumab super-responders in clinical practice: insights from a large Italian multicenter cohort of women with severe postmenopausal osteoporosis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. A novel sequential treatment approach between denosumab and romosozumab in patients with severe osteoporosis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Romosozumab and antiresorptive treatment: the importance of treatment sequence.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Masafumi KashiiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Toyonaka, Osaka, Japan.
Kosuke EbinaDepartment of Musculoskeletal Regenerative Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Kazuma KitaguchiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Toyonaka, Osaka, Japan.
Hideki YoshikawaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Toyonaka, Osaka, Japan.
Toyonaka Municipal Hospital · JPThe University of Osaka · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discontinuation of denosumab is associated with the increase of bone turnover markers to above-baseline levels (so-called rebound in bone turnover) and rapid bone loss. Several studies have reported vertebral fractures (VFs), particularly multiple spontaneous clinical VFs (MSCVFs), occurring after discontinuation of denosumab. There is currently no recommendation for the management of VFs including MSCVFs. Presently, romosozumab is the strongest anti-osteoporotic agent that inhibits sclerostin and rapidly increases bone mass, but it is uncertain that romosozumab is an effective treatment choice to treat VFs occurring after discontinuation of denosumab. Herein we reported a novel case of a 60-year-old woman who was treated with romosozumab after discontinuation of denosumab and subsequently suffered MSCVFs under romosozumab treatment. She had a history of two osteoporotic VFs (T6 and T8) and received five doses of 60 mg denosumab every 6 months following the osteoporosis diagnosis. As per the patient's convenience, the sixth denosumab injection was postponed. To improve the persistent low bone mass in the lumbar spine (T-score -3.8), 210 mg romosozumab was administered monthly after 9 months following the last denosumab injection. At the first romosozumab injection, she had no clinical symptoms such as low back pain, but her bone formation and resorption marker levels elevated compared with those treated with denosumab. After three doses of romosozumab, spontaneous severe low back pain occurred, and time-course radiographs revealed five new VFs (T12, L2, L3, L4, and L5). Romosozumab administration had no suppressive effect on bone resorption during the rebound in bone turnover after discontinuation of denosumab. This case suggests that romosozumab is not effective in preventing VFs or MSCVFs after denosumab discontinuation.

Indexed as

DenosumabDiscontinuationRomosozumabVertebral fractures

Identifiers

PMID32548215
PMCPMC7284126
OpenAlexW3033479596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.