Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32548133›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2020

Extraction and Detection of Avian Influenza Virus From Wetland Sediment Using Enrichment-Based Targeted Resequencing.

Lauren C Tindale, Waren Baticados, Jun Duan, Michelle Coombe, Agatha Jassem, Patrick Tang, Miguel Uyaguari-Diaz, Richard Moore, Chelsea Himsworth, William Hsiao and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lauren C TindaleDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Waren BaticadosDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Jun DuanDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Michelle CoombeSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Agatha JassemDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Patrick TangDepartment of Pathology, Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar.
Miguel Uyaguari-DiazBritish Columbia Centre for Disease Control Public Health Laboratory, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Richard MooreCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Chelsea HimsworthSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
William HsiaoDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Natalie PrystajeckyDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
BC Centre for Disease Control · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CACanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre · CAMinistry of Agriculture · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early virus detection and characterization is key to successful avian influenza virus (AIV) surveillance for the health of humans as well as domestic poultry. We explored a novel sampling approach and molecular strategy using sediment from wetlands and outdoor waterbodies on poultry farms as a population-level proxy of AIV activity in waterfowls. RNA was extracted using the MoBio RNA PowerSoil Total RNA isolation kit with additional chloroform extraction steps to reduce PCR inhibition. AIV matrix protein (MP) gene was detected in 42/345 (12.2%) samples by RT-qPCR; an additional 64 (18.6%) samples showed evidence of amplification below the threshold and were categorized as "suspect positive." Enrichment-based targeted resequencing (TR) identified AIV sequences in 79/345 (22.9%) samples. TR probes were designed for MP, hemagglutinin (HA), and neuraminidase (NA), however PB2 and PA were also identified. Although RT-qPCR and TR only had fair-moderate agreement, RT-qPCR positivity was predictive of TR-positivity both when using only strictly positive RT-qPCR samples (OR = 11.29) and when coding suspect positives as positive (OR = 7.56). This indicates that RT-qPCR could be used as a screening tool to select samples for virus characterization by TR and that future studies should consider RT-qPCR suspect positives to be positive samples for subsequent resequencing when avoiding false negatives is the priority, for instance in a diagnostic test, and to consider suspect positives to be negative samples when cost efficiency over a large number of samples is the priority, for instance in a surveillance program. A total of 13 HA (H1-7, H9-13, H16) and 9 NA (N1-9) subtypes were identified, with a maximum of 8 HA and 8 NA subtypes detected in a single sample. The optimized RNA extraction and targeted resequencing methods provided increased virus detection and subtyping characterization that could be implemented in an AIV surveillance system.

Indexed as

avian influenza virusnext generation sequencingnucleic acid extractionRT-qPCRsedimentsurveillancewaterfowl

Identifiers

PMID32548133
PMCPMC7273442
OpenAlexW3028685851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.