Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32547684›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of stem cells2020

How old is too old?

John Underwood, Mahvish Rahim, Carijo West, Rebecca Britton, Elaine Skipworth, Vicki Graves, Steven Sexton, Hillary Harris, Dave Schwering, Anthony Sinn and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of stem cells, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05573412 (Comparison of the Proliferative Potential of Human Peripheral Blood Stem Cells Based on Demographic Factors and Cryopreservation Time), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05573412 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of the Proliferative Potential of Human Peripheral Blood Stem Cells Based on Demographic Factors and Cryopreservation Time

TypeobservationalSponsorAndrews Research & Education FoundationRan2022 to 2023Enrolled100ConditionsHealthyArmsCellular analysis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

John UnderwoodDepartments of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States.
Mahvish RahimDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States.
Carijo WestCellular Therapy Laboratory, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States.
Rebecca BrittonCellular Therapy Laboratory, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States.
Elaine SkipworthCellular Therapy Laboratory, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States.
Vicki GravesCellular Therapy Laboratory, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States.
Steven SextonCellular Therapy Laboratory, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States.
Hillary HarrisCellular Therapy Laboratory, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States.
Dave SchweringCellular Therapy Laboratory, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States.
Anthony SinnDepartment of Pediatrics, Herman B Wells Center for Pediatric Research, In Vivo Therapeutics Core and Angio Biocore Shared Resource Facilities for the Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States.
Karen E PollokDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States.
Kent A RobertsonDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States.
W Scott GoebelDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States. sgoebel2@iu.edu.
Kerry M HegeDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States.
Indiana University Health · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · US

Funding

Tumor Microenvironment and Metastasis ProgramP30CA082709 · NCI · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI Jun Wan · 1999 to 2026
$59.3M
Regulating hematopoietic stem cells and hematopoiesis for clinical efficacyP30DK090948 · NIDDK · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI BROXMEYER, HAL E., SROUR, EDWARD F · 2010 to 2014
$3.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA082709NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK090948
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) are commonly cryopreserved awaiting clinical use for hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Long term cryopreservation is commonly defined as five years or longer, and limited data exists regarding how long PBSC can be cryopreserved and retain the ability to successfully engraft. Clinical programs, stem cell banks, and regulatory and accrediting agencies interested in product stability would benefit from such data. Thus, we assessed recovery and colony forming ability of PBSC following long-term cryopreservation as well as their ability to engraft in NOD/SCID/IL-2Rγ

aimTo investigate the in vivo engraftment potential of long-term cryopreserved PBSC units.

methodsPBSC units which were collected and frozen using validated clinical protocols were obtained for research use from the Cellular Therapy Laboratory at Indiana University Health. These units were thawed in the Cellular Therapy Laboratory using clinical standards of practice, and the pre-freeze and post-thaw characteristics of the units were compared. Progenitor function was assessed using standard colony-forming assays. CD34-selected cells were transplanted into immunodeficient mice to assess stem cell function.

resultsTen PBSC units with mean of 17 years in cryopreservation (range 13.6-18.3 years) demonstrated a mean total cell recovery of 88% ± 12% (range 68%-110%) and post-thaw viability of 69% ± 17% (range 34%-86%). BFU-E growth was shown in 9 of 10 units and CFU-GM growth in 7 of 10 units post-thaw. Immunodeficient mice were transplanted with CD34-selected cells from four randomly chosen PBSC units. All mice demonstrated long-term engraftment at 12 wk with mean 34% ± 24% human CD45+ cells, and differentiation with presence of human CD19+, CD3+ and CD33+ cells. Harvested bone marrow from all mice demonstrated growth of erythroid and myeloid colonies.

conclusionWe demonstrated engraftment of clinically-collected and thawed PBSC following cryopreservation up to 18 years in NSG mice, signifying likely successful clinical transplantation of PBSC following long-term cryopreservation.

Indexed as

Colony-forming units assayCryopreservationHematopoietic stem cellsHematopoietic stem cell transplantationIn vitro techniquesLong-term storagePeripheral blood stem cellTransplantViability

Identifiers

PMID32547684
PMCPMC7280863
OpenAlexW3032048939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.