Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32547627›Full record

ReviewDrugs in context2020

Temozolomide and oral etoposide in children with recurrent malignant brain tumors.

Antonio Ruggiero, Anna Ariano, Silvia Triarico, Michele Antonio Capozza, Alberto Romano, Palma Maurizi, Stefano Mastrangelo, Giorgio Attinà

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs in context, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Serendipity in Neuro-Oncology: The Evolution of Chemotherapeutic Agents.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Natural Polyphenols as Modulators of Etoposide Anti-Cancer Activity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Antonio RuggieroPediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Anna ArianoPediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Silvia TriaricoPediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Michele Antonio CapozzaPediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Alberto RomanoPediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Palma MauriziPediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Stefano MastrangeloPediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Giorgio AttinàPediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite advances in the treatment of brain tumors, the prognosis of children with recurrent malignant brain tumors remains poor. Etoposide (VP-16), an inhibitor of nuclear enzyme deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)-topoisomerase II, has shown activity in brain tumors. Its efficacy appears schedule dependent but, to date, the most effective schedule of administration has not been well defined. Temozolomide (TMZ), like VP-16, penetrates the blood-brain barrier and has activity against malignant brain tumors. This novel alkylating agent is rapidly absorbed and is highly bioavailable after oral administration. The antitumor activity of TMZ has been shown to be schedule dependent. Based on the evidence of different mechanisms of cytotoxicity, TMZ and VP-16 have been utilized in combination in patients with malignant brain tumors. This review evaluates the results derived from the combination use of TMZ and oral VP-16. The reported data suggest potential activity of oral VP-16 and TMZ alone or in combination. Further clinical trials are needed to explore and confirm their promising activity in relapsed brain neoplasms.

Indexed as

etoposidegliomamedulloblastomarecurrent brain tumortemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID32547627
PMCPMC7271709
OpenAlexW3033066276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.