Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32547596›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genetics2020

Gene Regulatory Network Inference: Connecting Plant Biology and Mathematical Modeling.

Lisa Van den Broeck, Max Gordon, Dirk Inzé, Cranos Williams, Rosangela Sozzani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Understanding developmental system drift.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024
    Review
  13. Dynamic Intervention in Gene Regulatory Networks: A Partially Observed Zero-Sum Markov Game.Control Technology and Applications. Control Technology and Applications · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lisa Van den BroeckDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Max GordonDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Dirk InzéDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Cranos WilliamsDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Rosangela SozzaniDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.

Funding

Molecular Biotechnology Training at North Carolina State UniversityT32GM008776 · NIGMS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI KELLY, ROBERT M · 2000 to 2019
$3.9M
NC STATE MOLECULAR BIOTECHNOLOGY TRAINING PROGRAM (MBTP)T32GM133366 · NIGMS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI Jason M. Haugh, Robert M Kelly · 2020 to 2026
$3.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008776NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM133366
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant responses to environmental and intrinsic signals are tightly controlled by multiple transcription factors (TFs). These TFs and their regulatory connections form gene regulatory networks (GRNs), which provide a blueprint of the transcriptional regulations underlying plant development and environmental responses. This review provides examples of experimental methodologies commonly used to identify regulatory interactions and generate GRNs. Additionally, this review describes network inference techniques that leverage gene expression data to predict regulatory interactions. These computational and experimental methodologies yield complex networks that can identify new regulatory interactions, driving novel hypotheses. Biological properties that contribute to the complexity of GRNs are also described in this review. These include network topology, network size, transient binding of TFs to DNA, and competition between multiple upstream regulators. Finally, this review highlights the potential of machine learning approaches to leverage gene expression data to predict phenotypic outputs.

Indexed as

experimental methodologiesgene regulatory networkmachine learningnetwork inferencenetwork properties

Identifiers

PMID32547596
PMCPMC7270862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.