Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32547573›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2020

Soil Sickness in Aged Tea Plantation Is Associated With a Shift in Microbial Communities as a Result of Plant Polyphenol Accumulation in the Tea Gardens.

Yasir Arafat, Israr Ud Din, Muhammad Tayyab, Yuhang Jiang, Ting Chen, Zhaoying Cai, Hanyu Zhao, Xiangmin Lin, Wenxiong Lin, Sheng Lin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
12.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A Novel StrainCells · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Diversity of Endophytes ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yasir ArafatKey Laboratory of Fujian Province for Agroecological Process and Safety Monitoring, College of Life Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Israr Ud DinInstitute of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, The University of Agriculture Peshawar, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Muhammad TayyabKey Laboratory of Fujian Province for Agroecological Process and Safety Monitoring, College of Life Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Yuhang JiangKey Laboratory of Fujian Province for Agroecological Process and Safety Monitoring, College of Life Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Ting ChenKey Laboratory of Fujian Province for Agroecological Process and Safety Monitoring, College of Life Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Zhaoying CaiKey Laboratory of Fujian Province for Agroecological Process and Safety Monitoring, College of Life Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Hanyu ZhaoKey Laboratory of Fujian Province for Agroecological Process and Safety Monitoring, College of Life Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Xiangmin LinKey Laboratory of Fujian Province for Agroecological Process and Safety Monitoring, College of Life Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Wenxiong LinKey Laboratory of Fujian Province for Agroecological Process and Safety Monitoring, College of Life Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Sheng LinKey Laboratory of Fujian Province for Agroecological Process and Safety Monitoring, College of Life Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University · CNThe University of Agriculture, Peshawar · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In conventional tea plantations, a large amount of pruned material returns to the soil surface, putting a high quantity of polyphenols into the soil. The accumulation of active allelochemicals in the tea rhizosphere and subsequent shift in beneficial microbes may be the cause of acidification, soil sickness, and regeneration problem, which may be attributed to hindrance of plant growth, development, and low yield in long-term monoculture tea plantation. However, the role of pruning leaf litter in soil sickness under consecutive tea monoculture is unclear. Here, we investigated soil samples taken from conventional tea gardens of different ages (2, 15, and 30 years) and under the effect of regular pruning. Different approaches including liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) analysis of the leaf litter, metagenomic study of root-associated bacterial communities, and

Indexed as

catechinsindirect allelopathymonoculture problemsplant polyphenolsoil sickness

Identifiers

PMID32547573
PMCPMC7270330
OpenAlexW3031926896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.