Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32547571›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2020

With Over 60 Independent Losses, Stomata Are Expendable in Mosses.

Karen S Renzaglia, William B Browning, Amelia Merced

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. In situ cavitation bubble manometry reveals a lack of light-activated guard cell turgor modulation in bryophytes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Callose in leptoid cell walls of the mossFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  5. Stomata: the holey grail of plant evolution.American journal of botany · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karen S RenzagliaPlant Biology Department, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL, United States.
William B BrowningPlant Biology Department, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL, United States.
Amelia MercedInternational Institute of Tropical Forestry, USDA Forest Service, San Juan, PR, United States.
Southern Illinois University Carbondale · USUS Forest Service · US

Funding

Southern Illinois Bridges to the Baccalaureate ProgramR25GM107760 · NIGMS · SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY CARBONDALE · PI ARMSTRONG, LORI, DETHROW, JOSEPH H. · 2013 to 2023
$2.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM107760
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because stomata in bryophytes are uniquely located on sporangia, the physiological and evolutionary constraints placed on bryophyte stomata are fundamentally different from those on leaves of tracheophytes. Although losses of stomata have been documented in mosses, the extent to which this evolutionary process occurred remains relatively unexplored. We initiated this study by plotting the known occurrences of stomata loss and numbers per capsule on the most recent moss phylogeny. From this, we identified 40 families and 74 genera that lack stomata, of which at least 63 are independent losses. No trends in stomata losses or numbers are evident in any direction across moss diversity. Extant taxa in early divergent moss lineages either lack stomata or produce pseudostomata that do not form pores. The earliest land plant macrofossils from 400 ma exhibit similar sporangial morphologies and stomatal distribution to extant mosses, suggesting that the earliest mosses may have possessed and lost stomata as is common in the group. To understand why stomata are expendable in mosses, we conducted comparative anatomical studies on a range of mosses with and without stomata. We compared the anatomy of stomate and astomate taxa and the development of intercellular spaces, including substomatal cavities, across mosses. Two types of intercellular spaces that develop differently are seen in peristomate mosses, those associated with stomata and those that surround the spore sac. Capsule architecture in astomate mosses ranges from solid in the taxa in early divergent lineages to containing an internal space that is directly connected to the conducing tissue and is involved in capsule expansion and the nourishment, hydration and development of spores. This anatomy reveals there are different architectural arrangements of tissues within moss capsules that are equally effective in accomplishing the essential processes of sporogenesis and spore dispersal. Stomata are not foundational to these processes.

Indexed as

capsuleguard cellsintercellular spaceland plant evolutionmossesstomata

Identifiers

PMID32547571
PMCPMC7270291
OpenAlexW3030844970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.