Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32547285›Full record

ArticleClinical medicine insights. Endocrinology and diabetes2020

Clinical Features, Therapeutic Trends, and Outcome of Giant Prolactinomas: A Single-Center Experience Over a 12-Year Period.

Mussa H Almalki, Naji Aljohani, Saad Alzahrani, Ohoud Almohareb, Maswood M Ahmad, Abdullah A Alrashed, Fahad Alshahrani, Badurudeen Mahmood Buhary

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical medicine insights. Endocrinology and diabetes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Long-term Follow-up of 84 Patients With Giant Prolactinomas-A Swedish Nationwide Study.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mussa H AlmalkiObesity, Endocrine and Metabolism Center, King Fahad Medical City (KFMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4068-5465
Naji AljohaniObesity, Endocrine and Metabolism Center, King Fahad Medical City (KFMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Saad AlzahraniObesity, Endocrine and Metabolism Center, King Fahad Medical City (KFMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ohoud AlmoharebObesity, Endocrine and Metabolism Center, King Fahad Medical City (KFMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Maswood M AhmadObesity, Endocrine and Metabolism Center, King Fahad Medical City (KFMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah A AlrashedDepartment of Neuroimaging and Intervention, Medical Imaging Administration, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Fahad AlshahraniKing Abdulaziz Medical City, College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Badurudeen Mahmood BuharyObesity, Endocrine and Metabolism Center, King Fahad Medical City (KFMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
King Fahd Medical City · SAKing Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundManagement of giant prolactinomas presents a different challenge than the management of traditional prolactinomas.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to report the largest long-term single-center study of giant prolactinomas to analyze their clinical features; define epidemiological characteristics, comorbidities, complications, treatment outcomes; and to demonstrate our experience with long-term cabergoline (CAB) treatment of these giant tumors.

methodsA retrospective case study and clinical review of patients presenting with giant prolactinomas in the pituitary clinic at King Fahad Medical City (KFMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, in the period between 2006 and 2018 were included in the study. Of the charts reviewed, 33 patients (24 men; 9 women) with age of diagnosis between 18 and 63 years (mean = 37.21 years) met the selection criteria for giant prolactinomas.

resultThe most common presenting features include headache (87.8%), visual defects (69.7%), and hypogonadism (51.5%). The baseline means serum prolactin (PRL) level was extremely high for both sexes (95 615.03 nmol/L), which eventually decreased by as much as 95.4% after CAB treatment. Serum PRL concentrations completely normalized in 11 patients and significantly reduced in 22 patients. The mean tumor volume at baseline was 42.87 cm

conclusionsFindings reinforce results from our previous study that CAB provides dramatic clinical improvements with an excellent safety profile. The CAB should, therefore, be considered as the primary therapy for giant prolactinomas.

Indexed as

cabergolinecomorbidityGiant prolactinomapituitary adenomaprolactinremissiontranssphenoidal surgerytumor

Identifiers

PMID32547285
PMCPMC7273563
OpenAlexW3033498650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.