ArticleClinical epidemiology2020
The Population Prevalence, Associations of Congenital Heart Defect and Mortality Risk for Down's Syndrome in South Korea Based on National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) Data.
Article in Clinical epidemiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prevalence and incidence of physical health conditions in people with intellectual disability - a systematic review.PloS one · 2021Pooled it
- Cardiovascular risk associated with intellectual disability among adults with type 2 diabetes: a nationwide cohort study in South Korea.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Population Prevalence, Cancer Risk, and Mortality Risk of Turner Syndrome in South Korean Women Based on National Health Insurance Service Data.Yonsei medical journal · 2022Article
- Epidemiology of Acute Leukemia among Children with Down Syndrome in Korea.Cancer research and treatment · 2022Article
- Clinical Study Using Healthcare Claims Database.Journal of rheumatic diseases · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the present study, we estimated the population prevalence, associations of congenital heart defect (CHD) and mortality risk for DS using data from National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) and Rare Diseases Registry (RDR).
methodsWe collected data on subjects with DS who were registered in the RDR between 2010 and 2015. To estimate associations of CHD and mortality risk of DS, the data of DS subjects were compared with 1:5 age- and sex-matched controls.
resultsIn 2015, 2077 individuals with DS were identified out of the total population of 51,574,044 South Koreans and the prevalence was 4.03 per 100,000 persons. The trend of DS population prevalence across 10-year-old intervals showed a peak in the group under the age of 10 years (26.0 per 100,000 persons) and then declined sharply after the age of 20 years (0.98 per 100,000 persons at 30-39 years of age). In subjects with DS, the frequencies of atrial septal defect [odds ratios (OR) =65.9; 95% CI, 84.1-99.1], ventricular septal defect (OR = 88.1, 95% CI, 57.9-134.1), patent ductus arteriosus (OR = 56.9, 95% CI, 40.1-80.8), tetralogy of fallot (OR = 42.1, 95% CI, 19.3-92.3), or atrioventricular septal defect (OR = 510.0, 95% CI, 126.7-999.0) were higher than those of age- and sex-matched controls. The risk of death in patients with DS was significantly higher than that of age- and sex-matched controls [hazard ratio (HR) =41.7, 95% CI 20.0-87.0].
conclusionIn South Korea, the DS population prevalence was 4.03 per 100,000 persons in 2015. The subjects with DS were more likely to accompany CHD and have higher mortality risk than healthy controls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.