Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32547015›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of nanomedicine2020

Emerging Antineoplastic Biogenic Gold Nanomaterials for Breast Cancer Therapeutics: A Systematic Review.

Muthupandian Saravanan, Hossein Vahidi, David Medina Cruz, Ada Vernet-Crua, Ebrahim Mostafavi, Ryan Stelmach, Thomas J Webster, Mohammad Ali Mahjoub, Masoumeh Rashedi, Hamed Barabadi

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of nanomedicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Heliyon · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Muthupandian SaravananDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Division of Biomedical Science, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Mekelle University, Mekelle 1871, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-1480-3555
Hossein VahidiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, School of Pharmacy, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
David Medina CruzDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7658-583X
Ada Vernet-CruaDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5307-4076
Ebrahim MostafaviDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3958-5002
Ryan StelmachDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Thomas J WebsterDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2028-5969
Mohammad Ali MahjoubDepartment of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-8149-6607
Masoumeh RashediStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran.
Hamed BarabadiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, School of Pharmacy, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-8353-4125
Northeastern University · USShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IRGonabad University of Medical Sciences · IRMekelle University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer remains as a concerning global health issue, being the second leading cause of cancer deaths among women in the United States (US) in 2019. Therefore, there is an urgent and substantial need to explore novel strategies to combat breast cancer. A potential solution may come from the use of cancer nanotechnology, an innovative field of study which investigates the potential of nanomaterials for cancer diagnosis, therapy, and theranostic applications. Consequently, the theranostic functionality of cancer nanotechnology has been gaining much attention between scientists during the past few years and is growing exponentially. The use of biosynthesized gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) has been explored as an efficient mechanism for the treatment of breast cancer. The present study supposed a global systematic review to evaluate the effectiveness of biogenic AuNPs for the treatment of breast cancer and their anticancer molecular mechanisms through in vitro studies. Online electronic databases, including Cochrane, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Science Direct, ProQuest, and Embase, were searched for the articles published up to July 16, 2019. Our findings revealed that plant-mediated synthesis was the most common approach for the generation of AuNPs. Most of the studies reported spherical or nearly spherical-shaped AuNPs with a mean diameter less than 100 nm in size. A significantly larger cytotoxicity was observed when the biogenic AuNPs were tested towards breast cancer cells compared to healthy cells. Moreover, biogenic AuNPs demonstrated significant synergistic activity in combination with other anticancer drugs through in vitro studies. Although we provided strong and comprehensive preliminary in vitro data, further in vivo investigations are required to show the reliability and efficacy of these NPs in animal models.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsCell DeathFemaleGoldHumansMetal NanoparticlesReactive Oxygen SpeciesAntineoplastic AgentsGoldReactive Oxygen Speciesanti-cancercancer nanotechnologygold nanoparticlesnanotoxicity

Identifiers

PMID32547015
PMCPMC7245458
OpenAlexW3025115400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.