Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32546762›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2020

Ambulatory Surgery Protocol for Endoscopic Endonasal Resection of Pituitary Adenomas: A Prospective Single-arm Trial with Initial Implementation Experience.

Yang Liu, Tao Zheng, Wenhai Lv, Long Chen, Binfang Zhao, Xue Jiang, Lin Ye, Liang Qu, Lanfu Zhao, Yufu Zhang and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. ERAS Protocol Elements and Neurosurgery-Specific Considerations: A Narrative Review.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yang Liu *Department of Neurology, No.988 Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force, Zheng Zhou, China.
Tao Zheng *Department of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Wenhai LvDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Long ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Binfang ZhaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Xue JiangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Lin YeDepartment of Nutrition, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Liang QuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Lanfu ZhaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Yufu ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Yafei XueDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Lei ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Bolin LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Yingxi WuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Zhengmin LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Jiangtao NiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Ruigang LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Yan QuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Guodong GaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Yuan WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China. bladerunnerwang@qq.com.
Shiming HeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xi'an International Medical Center, Xi'an, China. he-shiming@163.com.
Air Force Medical University · CNXi’an International University · CNPeople's Liberation Army 401 Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal resection has been accepted as a routine therapy for pituitary adenoma, but the postoperative hospital stay is typically several days long. With the advantages of reduced cost and improved patient satisfaction, the application of ambulatory surgery (AS) has developed rapidly. However, AS was still rarely adopted in neurosurgery. Here we designed an AS treatment protocol for pituitary adenoma with the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA), and reported our initial experiences regarding the safety and efficacy of the AS protocol. 63 patients who presented with pituitary adenoma were screened at the Department of Neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital from July to September, 2017. A total of 20 pituitary adenoma patients who met the inclusion criteria underwent EEA surgery using this evidence-based AS protocol, which emphasized adequate assessment for eligibility, full preparation to minimize invasiveness, enhanced recovery, and active perioperative patient education. Of the 20 patients enrolled, 18 were discharged on the afternoon of the operation day with a median total length of stay (LOS) of 31 hours (range, 29-32) hours. The median LOS after surgery was 6.5 (range, 5-8) hours. Two patients were transferred from the AS protocol to conventional care due to intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage (one case) and an unsatisfying post-anesthetic discharge score (one case). Complications included transient and reversible mild postoperative nausea and vomiting [visual analog scale (VAS) score <3], headache (VAS score <3) after the operation or early after discharge. No patient was readmitted. Our results supported the safety and efficacy of the AS protocol for pituitary adenoma patients undergoing EEA resection among eligible patients, and further evaluation of this protocol in controlled studies with a larger sample size is warranted.

Indexed as

AdenomaAdultAgedAmbulatory Surgical ProceduresChinaEndoscopyFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedNasal CavityNeurosurgical ProceduresNosePituitary NeoplasmsProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID32546762
PMCPMC7297807
OpenAlexW3035619455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.