Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32546713›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Multi-set Pre-processing of Multicolor Flow Cytometry Data.

Rita Folcarelli, Gerjen H Tinnevelt, Bart Hilvering, Kristiaan Wouters, Selma van Staveren, Geert J Postma, Nienke Vrisekoop, Lutgarde M C Buydens, Leo Koenderman, Jeroen J Jansen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rita Folcarelli *Radboud University, Institute for Molecules and Materials, Analytical Chemistry, P.O. Box 9010, 6500 GL, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. chemometrics@science.ru.nl.
Gerjen H Tinnevelt *Radboud University, Institute for Molecules and Materials, Analytical Chemistry, P.O. Box 9010, 6500 GL, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. chemometrics@science.ru.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0758-4128
Bart HilveringDepartment of Respiratory Medicine laboratory of translational immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Kristiaan WoutersDepartment of Internal Medicine, Laboratory of Metabolism and Vascular Medicine, P.O. Box 616 (UNS50/14), 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Selma van StaverenTI-COAST, Science Park 904, 1098 XH, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Geert J PostmaRadboud University, Institute for Molecules and Materials, Analytical Chemistry, P.O. Box 9010, 6500 GL, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Nienke VrisekoopDepartment of Respiratory Medicine laboratory of translational immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Lutgarde M C BuydensRadboud University, Institute for Molecules and Materials, Analytical Chemistry, P.O. Box 9010, 6500 GL, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Leo KoendermanDepartment of Respiratory Medicine laboratory of translational immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5636-6453
Jeroen J JansenRadboud University, Institute for Molecules and Materials, Analytical Chemistry, P.O. Box 9010, 6500 GL, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flow Cytometry is an analytical technology to simultaneously measure multiple markers per single cell. Ten thousands to millions of single cells can be measured per sample and each sample may contain a different number of cells. All samples may be bundled together, leading to a 'multi-set' structure. Many multivariate methods have been developed for Flow Cytometry data but none of them considers this structure in their quantitative handling of the data. The standard pre-processing used by existing multivariate methods provides models mainly influenced by the samples with more cells, while such a model should provide a balanced view of the biomedical information within all measurements. We propose an alternative 'multi-set' preprocessing that corrects for the difference in number of cells measured, balancing the relative importance of each multi-cell sample in the data while using all data collected from these expensive analyses. Moreover, one case example shows how multi-set pre-processing may benefit removal of undesired measurement-to-measurement variability and another where class-based multi-set pre-processing enhances the studied response upon comparison to the control reference samples. Our results show that adjusting data analysis algorithms to consider this multi-set structure may greatly benefit immunological insight and classification performance of Flow Cytometry data.

Indexed as

Multivariate AnalysisAlgorithmsBiomarkersData AnalysisElectronic Data ProcessingFlow CytometryHumansMathematical ComputingResearch DesignBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID32546713
PMCPMC7297713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.