Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32546657›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical ethics2020

Triage of critical care resources in COVID-19: a stronger role for justice.

Lynette Reid

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical ethics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Ethical Guidance for Hard Decisions: A Critical Review of Early International COVID-19 ICU Triage Guidelines.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Ethics of ICU triage during COVID-19.British medical bulletin · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Biases in COVID-19 Medical Resource Dilemmas.Frontiers in psychology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Lynette ReidDepartment of Bioethics, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada lynette.reid@dal.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Some ethicists assert that there is a consensus that maximising medical outcomes takes precedence as a principle of resource allocation in emergency triage of absolutely scarce resources. But the nature of the current severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus 2 pandemic and the history of debate about balancing equity and efficiency in resource allocation do not support this assertion. I distinguish a number of concerns with justice and balancing considerations that should play a role in critical care triage policy, focusing on discrimination and on fundamental egalitarian and social justice concerns.

Indexed as

Coronavirus InfectionsPandemicsPneumonia, ViralSocial JusticeTriageBetacoronavirusCOVID-19Critical CareHumansResource AllocationSARS-CoV-2distributive justicepublic health ethicsresource allocation

Identifiers

PMID32546657
PMCPMC7316108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.