Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32546527›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Novel genetic features of human and mouse Purkinje cell differentiation defined by comparative transcriptomics.

David E Buchholz, Thomas S Carroll, Arif Kocabas, Xiaodong Zhu, Hourinaz Behesti, Phyllis L Faust, Lauren Stalbow, Yin Fang, Mary E Hatten

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Histone bivalency in CNS development.Genes & development · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David E BuchholzLaboratory of Developmental Neurobiology, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065.ORCID 0000-0003-4021-7696
Thomas S CarrollBioinformatics Resource Center, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065.
Arif KocabasLaboratory of Developmental Neurobiology, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065.
Xiaodong ZhuLaboratory of Developmental Neurobiology, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065.ORCID 0000-0003-4345-5526
Hourinaz BehestiLaboratory of Developmental Neurobiology, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065.
Phyllis L FaustDepartment of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and the New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY 10032.ORCID 0000-0001-6533-7921
Lauren StalbowLaboratory of Developmental Neurobiology, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065.
Yin FangLaboratory of Developmental Neurobiology, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065.
Mary E HattenLaboratory of Developmental Neurobiology, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065; hatten@rockefeller.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9059-660X
Rockefeller University · USNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · US

Funding

Developing, Demonstrating, and Disseminating Innovative Programs to Achieve Translational SuccessUL1TR001866 · NCATS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI COLLER, BARRY, KRUEGER, JAMES G · 2016 to 2025
$40.6M
Development of a model system to study human cerebellar neuronsR21NS093540 · NINDS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI HATTEN, MARY ELIZABETH · 2015 to 2016
$466k
Molecular Mechanisms of Purkinje Cell Degeneration in Ataxia-TelangiectasiaR21NS121438 · NINDS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI HATTEN, MARY ELIZABETH · 2021 to 2021
$466k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001866NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS093540NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS121438
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparative transcriptomics between differentiating human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) and developing mouse neurons offers a powerful approach to compare genetic and epigenetic pathways in human and mouse neurons. To analyze human Purkinje cell (PC) differentiation, we optimized a protocol to generate human pluripotent stem cell-derived Purkinje cells (hPSC-PCs) that formed synapses when cultured with mouse cerebellar glia and granule cells and fired large calcium currents, measured with the genetically encoded calcium indicator jRGECO1a. To directly compare global gene expression of hPSC-PCs with developing mouse PCs, we used translating ribosomal affinity purification (TRAP). As a first step, we used

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationTranscriptomeAnimalsHumansMicePluripotent Stem CellsProteinsPurkinje CellsProteinshuman pluripotent stem cellsPurkinje celltranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID32546527
PMCPMC7334519
OpenAlexW3035666982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.