Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32546240›Full record

Trial reportBMC endocrine disorders2020

Diabetes conversation map - a novel tool for diabetes management self-efficacy among type 2 diabetes patients in Pakistan: a randomized controlled trial.

Rubina Qasim, Sarfaraz Masih, Mohammad Tahir Yousafzai, Hakim Shah, Abdul Manan, Yousaf Shah, Muhammad Yaqoob, Abida Razzaq, Ajmal Khan, Atiya Rahman Khan Rohilla

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC endocrine disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03747471 (Effect of Conversation Map on Diabetes Management Self-efficacy and Diabetic Distress Among Type 2DM Patient in Pakistan), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03747471 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of Conversation Map on Diabetes Management Self-efficacy and Diabetic Distress Among Type 2DM Patient in Pakistan: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorRubina QasimRan2019 to 2019Enrolled120ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Diabetes, Self Efficacy, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2ArmsDiabetic Conversation Map
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Rubina QasimDow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan. Qasim.ruby@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1663-9568
Sarfaraz MasihDow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Mohammad Tahir YousafzaiDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Hakim ShahIndus college of Allied Health, The Indus Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Abdul MananPatel Hospital and Institute of Nursing, Karachi, Pakistan.
Yousaf ShahDow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Muhammad YaqoobDow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Abida RazzaqLiaquat National Hospital College of Nursing, Karachi, Pakistan.
Ajmal KhanDow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Atiya Rahman Khan RohillaIndus college of Allied Health, The Indus Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Dow University of Health Sciences · PKIndus Hospital · PKAga Khan University · PKCivil Hospital Karachi · PKLiaquat National Hospital · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to measure the effect of diabetes education using the novel method of "diabetes conversation map (DCM)" as compared to routine counselling (RC) on diabetes management self-efficacy (DMSE) among patients living with type 2 diabetes in Karachi, Pakistan.

methodsA parallel arm randomized controlled trial among patients with type 2 diabetes aged 30-60 years, with HbA1c > 7%, diagnosed for at least 5 yrs., was conducted at the national institute of diabetes and endocrinology in Karachi, Pakistan. A total 123 type 2 diabetes patients were randomized into DCM (n = 62) or RC (n = 61). Four weekly diabetes control sessions of 40 min each using the DCM or RC was provided. DMSE was measured using a validated Urdu language DMSE tool at baseline and after three months of the randomization. Change in DMSE and HbA1c levels within groups (pre-post) and between the groups after 3 months of enrollment was compared.

resultsBaseline characteristics except HbA1c were similar between the two arms. After 3 months of enrollment, there was no change in the DMSE score in the RC arm however, significant increase in DMSE score was noted in the DCM arm (P = < 0.001). The average difference (95% confidence interval) in DMSE score between the DCM and RC arm was 33.7(27.3, 40.0; p = < 0.001) after 3 months of the enrollment. Difference in HbA1c within groups was not significant.

conclusionsDCM significantly improved DMSE among type 2 diabetes patients in a developing country setting like Pakistan. Healthcare workers caring for type 2 diabetes patients need to be trained on DCM to effectively utilize this novel tool for educating diabetes patients.

trial registrationThis trial was prospectively registered. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03747471. Date of registration: Nov 20. 2018.

Indexed as

CommunicationSelf EfficacyAdultBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2DietExerciseFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemic AgentsMaleMiddle AgedPakistanPatient Education as TopicGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanHypoglycemic AgentsConversation mapDiabetes educationDiabetes managementDiabetes management self-efficacyDiabetes mellitus type 2DMSELower middle-income countriesPakistan

Identifiers

PMID32546240
PMCPMC7298747
OpenAlexW3034948368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.