Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32546189›Full record

ArticleTrials2020

Intra-cluster correlation coefficients in primary care patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension.

Yi Lin Lee, Yvonne Mei Fong Lim, Kian Boon Law, Sheamini Sivasampu

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT06561126 (Engagement of coMmunity Through Participatory Learning and Action for cOntrol and preVEntion of Type II Diabetes and Its Risk Factors [EMPOWER-D]), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06561126 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Engagement of coMmunity Through Participatory Learning and Action for cOntrol and preVEntion of Type II Diabetes and Its Risk Factors [EMPOWER-D]: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorKhyber Medical University PeshawarRan2025 to 2026Enrolled12,744ConditionsType II Diabetes Mellitus, Intermediate Hyperglycemia (IHG)ArmsParticipatory, Learning and Action Based Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yi Lin LeeCentre for Clinical Trial, Institute for Clinical Research, Ampang Hospital, Ministry of Health, Jalan Mewah Utara, Pandan Mewah, 68000, Ampang, Selangor, Malaysia. yl.yilinlee@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8406-3150
Yvonne Mei Fong LimCentre for Clinical Outcome Research, Institute for Clinical Research, National Institute of Health, Ministry of Health, Kompleks Institut Kesihatan Negara (NIH), No. 1, Jalan Setia Murni U13/52, Seksyen U13, Setia Alam, 40170, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.
Kian Boon LawCentre for Clinical Trial, Institute for Clinical Research, Ampang Hospital, Ministry of Health, Jalan Mewah Utara, Pandan Mewah, 68000, Ampang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Sheamini SivasampuCentre for Clinical Outcome Research, Institute for Clinical Research, National Institute of Health, Ministry of Health, Kompleks Institut Kesihatan Negara (NIH), No. 1, Jalan Setia Murni U13/52, Seksyen U13, Setia Alam, 40170, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere are few sources of published data on intra-cluster correlation coefficients (ICCs) amongst patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and/or hypertension in primary care, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. ICC values are necessary for determining the sample sizes of cluster randomized trials. Hence, we aim to report the ICC values for a range of measures from a cluster-based interventional study conducted in Malaysia.

methodBaseline data from a large study entitled Evaluation of Enhanced Primary Health Care interventions in public health clinics (EnPHC-EVA: Facility) were used in this analysis. Data from 40 public primary care clinics were collected through retrospective chart reviews and a patient exit survey. We calculated the ICCs for processes of care, clinical outcomes and patient experiences in patients with T2D and/or hypertension using the analysis of variance approach.

resultsPatient experience had the highest ICC values compared to processes of care and clinical outcomes. The ICC values ranged from 0.01 to 0.48 for processes of care. Generally, the ICC values for processes of care for patients with hypertension only are higher than those for T2D patients, with or without hypertension. However, both groups of patients have similar ICCs for antihypertensive medications use. In addition, similar ICC values were observed for clinical outcomes, ranging from 0.01 to 0.09. For patient experience, the ICCs were between 0.03 (proportion of patients who are willing to recommend the clinic to their friends and family) and 0.25 (for Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care item 9, Given a copy of my treatment plan).

conclusionThe reported ICCs and their respective 95% confidence intervals for T2D and hypertension will be useful for estimating sample sizes and improving efficiency of cluster trials conducted in the primary care setting, particularly for low- and middle-income countries.

Indexed as

AgedCluster AnalysisData Interpretation, StatisticalDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansHypertensionMalaysiaMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRetrospective StudiesSample SizeTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeHypertensionIntra-cluster correlationPrimary careSample sizeType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID32546189
PMCPMC7298818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.