Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32546162›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

Out of pocket expenditures of patients with a chronic condition consulting a primary care provider in Tajikistan: a cross-sectional household survey.

Fabienne B Fischer, Zulfira Mengliboeva, Gulzira Karimova, Nasrullo Abdujabarov, Helen Prytherch, Kaspar Wyss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fabienne B FischerSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland. f.fischer@swisstph.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9860-2242
Zulfira MengliboevaSwiss Agency for Development and Cooperation's Enhancing Primary Health Care Services Project (Project Sino), Dushanbe, Tajikistan.
Gulzira KarimovaSwiss Agency for Development and Cooperation's Enhancing Primary Health Care Services Project (Project Sino), Dushanbe, Tajikistan.
Nasrullo AbdujabarovSwiss Agency for Development and Cooperation's Enhancing Primary Health Care Services Project (Project Sino), Dushanbe, Tajikistan.
Helen PrytherchSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Kaspar WyssSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation 7F-01270.05.01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWithin its reform efforts, the Government of Tajikistan is embracing the essential role of primary health care (PHC) in decreasing out of pocket (OOP) expenditures and increasing equity in access to health services. In the light of the increasing burden of disease relating to chronic conditions, we investigated OOP expenditures of patients with chronic conditions within a PHC setting; and if and how those expenditures are impacted by several interventions currently being implemented within Tajikistan.

methodsA cross-sectional survey among 1600 adult patients who had visited a PHC facility was conducted. The data obtained through interviews were descriptively analysed, and logistic regressions and gamma generalized linear models were performed.

resultsThe total OOP expenditures related to a patient's last visit to the PHC facility were 17.2 USD for those with chronic conditions and 13.9 USD for those visiting due to an acute condition. Adjustment for potential confounders reduced the discrepancy from 3.3 USD to 0.5 USD. This convergence of costs was only observed in districts covered by the Basic Benefit Package (BBP), a governmental pilot project, aiming to standardise exemptions for payment and formal co-payments for health care services. Hence, we found the BBP to have a protective impact for patients with chronic conditions. However, considering the demographics of these patients (older in age, with greater dependency on pensions and social aid, and lower socio-economic status) in combination with the 40% higher utilisation rate of PHC and the high rate of onward referrals to specialists; it is clear that patients with chronic conditions continue to face substantial long-term costs and disadvantages.

conclusionsAfter accounting for confounders, patients with chronic and acute conditions faced similar costs related to a single visit to a PHC facility in districts covered by the BBP. However, greater efforts are required to ensure that citizens are well informed about their rights to health care, the BBP and the services that should be provided at no cost at the point of delivery. Moreover, the needs of patients with chronic conditions warrant a more integrative approach that takes long-term expenditures and services beyond the level of PHC into account.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChronic DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFinancing, PersonalHealth Care SurveysHealth ExpendituresHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareReferral and ConsultationSocioeconomic FactorsCentral AsiaChronic conditionsChronic diseaseFamily medicineNon-communicable disease (NCD)Out of pocket expenditure (OOP)Primary health care (PHC)Tajikistan

Identifiers

PMID32546162
PMCPMC7298845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.