Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32546125›Full record

ReviewMolecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.)2020

Erythropoietin as candidate for supportive treatment of severe COVID-19.

Hannelore Ehrenreich, Karin Weissenborn, Martin Begemann, Markus Busch, Eduard Vieta, Kamilla W Miskowiak

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Successful Treatment of a Patient With Severe COVID-19 Using an Integrated Approach Addressing Mast Cells and Their Mediators.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2022
    Article
  15. Isolated erythrocytosis: A consequence of COVID-19 induced hypoxia.International journal of laboratory hematology · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Hannelore EhrenreichClinical Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine, Göttingen, Germany. ehrenreich@em.mpg.de.ORCID 0000-0001-8371-5711
Karin WeissenbornDepartment of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Martin BegemannClinical Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine, Göttingen, Germany.
Markus BuschCenter of Internal Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Eduard VietaInstitute of Neuroscience, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Spain.
Kamilla W MiskowiakPsychiatric Centre Copenhagen, University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. Kamilla.miskowiak@regionh.dk.
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DECentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental · ESCopenhagen University Hospital · DKMax Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine · DEUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In light of the present therapeutic situation in COVID-19, any measure to improve course and outcome of seriously affected individuals is of utmost importance. We recap here evidence that supports the use of human recombinant erythropoietin (EPO) for ameliorating course and outcome of seriously ill COVID-19 patients. This brief expert review grounds on available subject-relevant literature searched until May 14, 2020, including Medline, Google Scholar, and preprint servers. We delineate in brief sections, each introduced by a summary of respective COVID-19 references, how EPO may target a number of the gravest sequelae of these patients. EPO is expected to: (1) improve respiration at several levels including lung, brainstem, spinal cord and respiratory muscles; (2) counteract overshooting inflammation caused by cytokine storm/ inflammasome; (3) act neuroprotective and neuroregenerative in brain and peripheral nervous system. Based on this accumulating experimental and clinical evidence, we finally provide the research design for a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial including severely affected patients, which is planned to start shortly.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusBrain StemCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Cytokine Release SyndromeDouble-Blind MethodErythropoietinHumansLungNeuroprotective AgentsPandemicsPhrenic NervePneumonia, ViralProof of Concept StudyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecombinant ProteinsEPO protein, humanErythropoietinNeuroprotective AgentsRecombinant ProteinsRespiratory System Agentsclinical trial designcytokine stormEPOinflammationneuroprotectionrespiratory functionSARS-CoV-2; recombinant human erythropoietin

Identifiers

PMID32546125
PMCPMC7297268
OpenAlexW3035215875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.