Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32545572›Full record

ReviewCancers2020

Personalised Dosimetry in Radioembolisation for HCC: Impact on Clinical Outcome and on Trial Design.

Etienne Garin, Xavier Palard, Yan Rolland

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Utility of pre-procedural [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Observational
  8. Measure ofEJNMMI reports · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Radioembolization Dosimetry with Total-BodyJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Etienne GarinUniv Rennes, Inra, Inserm, Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Eugène Marquis, Institut NUMECAN (Nutrition, Métabolismes et Cancer)-UMR_A 1341, UMR_S 1241, F-35000 Rennes, France.
Xavier PalardCentre de lutte contre le Cancer Eugène Marquis, F 35042 Rennes, France.
Yan RollandUniv Rennes, CLCC Eugène Marquis, INSERM, LTSI-UMR 1099, F-35000 Rennes, France.
Inserm · FRCentre Eugène Marquis · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been used for many years, usually without any specific dosimetry endpoint. Despite good clinical results in early phase studies or in cohort studies, three randomized trials in locally advanced HCC available failed to demonstrate any improvement of overall overall survival (OS) in comparison with sorafenib. In recent years, many studies have evaluated the dosimetry of SIRT using either a simulation-based dosimetry (macroaggregated albumin (MAA)-based) or a post-therapy-based one (

Indexed as

dosimetryhepatocellular carcinomaradioembolisation

Identifiers

PMID32545572
PMCPMC7353030
OpenAlexW3035229551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.