Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32545464›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020

A Minimal PKPD Interaction Model for Evaluating Synergy Effects of Combined NSCLC Therapies.

Clara Mihaela Ionescu, Maria Ghita, Dana Copot, Eric Derom, Dirk Verellen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Old drugs, new weapons: current trends in repurposing therapies against antimicrobial resistance.Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Clara Mihaela IonescuResearch Group of Dynamical Systems and Control, Ghent University, Tech Lane Science Park 125, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7685-035X
Maria GhitaResearch Group of Dynamical Systems and Control, Ghent University, Tech Lane Science Park 125, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3463-5173
Dana CopotResearch Group of Dynamical Systems and Control, Ghent University, Tech Lane Science Park 125, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6010-830X
Eric DeromDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Gent, Belgium.
Dirk VerellenIridium Cancer Network-GZA Hospitals Sint Augustinus, Department of Medical Physics Radiotherapy, Oosterveldlaan 24, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium.
Ghent University · BEGhent University Hospital · BETechnical University of Cluj-Napoca · ROUniversity of Antwerp · BE

Funding

Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds 01D15919Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds 01J01619Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 12X6819N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper introduces a mathematical compartmental formulation of dose-effect synergy modelling for multiple therapies in non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): antiangiogenic, immuno- and radiotherapy. The model formulates the dose-effect relationship in a unified context, with tumor proliferating rates and necrotic tissue volume progression as a function of therapy management profiles. The model accounts for inter- and intra-response variability by using surface model response terms. Slow acting peripheral compartments such as fat and muscle for drug distribution are not modelled. This minimal pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) model is evaluated with reported data in mice from literature. A systematic analysis is performed by varying only radiotherapy profiles, while antiangiogenesis and immunotherapy are fixed to their initial profiles. Three radiotherapy protocols are selected from literature: (1) a single dose 5 Gy once weekly; (2) a dose of 5 Gy × 3 days followed by a 2 Gy × 3 days after two weeks and (3) a dose of 5 Gy + 2 × 0.075 Gy followed after two weeks by a 2 Gy + 2 × 0.075 Gy dose. A reduction of 28% in tumor end-volume after 30 days was observed in Protocol 2 when compared to Protocol 1. No changes in end-volume were observed between Protocol 2 and Protocol 3, this in agreement with other literature studies. Additional analysis on drug interaction suggested that higher synergy among drugs affects up to three-fold the tumor volume (increased synergy leads to significantly lower growth ratio and lower total tumor volume). Similarly, changes in patient response indicated that increased drug resistance leads to lower reduction rates of tumor volumes, with end-volume increased up to 25-30%. In conclusion, the proposed minimal PKPD model has physiological value and can be used to study therapy management protocols and is an aiding tool in the clinical decision making process. Although developed with data from mice studies, the model is scalable to NSCLC patients.

Indexed as

anomalous diffusionantiangiogenic therapyfractal kineticsimmunotherapylung cancermathematical modellingmouse datamultiple therapyradiotherapysynergyvariability

Identifiers

PMID32545464
PMCPMC7356515
OpenAlexW3034320022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.