Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32545362›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2020

A Review of

Hudson T Thames, Anuraj T Sukumaran

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Design of an oral vaccine againstThe veterinary quarterly · 2026
    Article
  2. The poultry chain in Sardinia (Italy): monitoring ofItalian journal of food safety · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Quantitative Detection ofBiosensors · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Microbiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Rapid Quantification ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  17. A Mini-Review on Multi-Hurdle Control ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  18. Comparison of Media for the Detection ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hudson T ThamesDepartment of Poultry Science, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA.
Anuraj T SukumaranDepartment of Poultry Science, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA.

Funding

Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station, Mississippi State University MIS 322380National Institute of Food and Agriculture MIS-322380
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poultry is one of the largest sources of animal-based protein in the United States. Poultry processing has grown from a small local network of plants to nearly 500 plants nationwide. Two of the most persistent bacteria in poultry processing are

Indexed as

AntimicrobialsbacteriophagebiofilmCampylobacterchickenPrevalenceSalmonella

Identifiers

PMID32545362
PMCPMC7353592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.