Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32545308›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Graphene Oxide Scaffold Stimulates Differentiation and Proangiogenic Activities of Myogenic Progenitor Cells.

Mateusz Wierzbicki, Anna Hotowy, Marta Kutwin, Sławomir Jaworski, Jaśmina Bałaban, Malwina Sosnowska, Barbara Wójcik, Aleksandra Wędzińska, André Chwalibog, Ewa Sawosz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Graphene-Based Materials: Biological and Biomedical Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mateusz WierzbickiDepartment of Nanobiotechnology and Experimental Ecology, Institute of Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warsaw, Poland.
Anna HotowyDepartment of Nanobiotechnology and Experimental Ecology, Institute of Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0596-1201
Marta KutwinDepartment of Nanobiotechnology and Experimental Ecology, Institute of Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warsaw, Poland.
Sławomir JaworskiDepartment of Nanobiotechnology and Experimental Ecology, Institute of Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warsaw, Poland.
Jaśmina BałabanDepartment of Nanobiotechnology and Experimental Ecology, Institute of Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warsaw, Poland.
Malwina SosnowskaDepartment of Nanobiotechnology and Experimental Ecology, Institute of Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warsaw, Poland.
Barbara WójcikDepartment of Nanobiotechnology and Experimental Ecology, Institute of Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warsaw, Poland.
Aleksandra WędzińskaDepartment of Nanobiotechnology and Experimental Ecology, Institute of Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warsaw, Poland.
André ChwalibogDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Groennegaardsvej 3, 1870 Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8150-2392
Ewa SawoszDepartment of Nanobiotechnology and Experimental Ecology, Institute of Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warsaw, Poland.
Warsaw University of Life Sciences · PLUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

National Science Centre Poland 2016/21/B/NZ9/01029.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The physiological process of muscle regeneration is quite limited due to low satellite cell quantity and also the inability to regenerate and reconstruct niche tissue. The purpose of the study was to examine whether a graphene oxide scaffold is able to stimulate myogenic progenitor cell proliferation and the endocrine functions of differentiating cells, and therefore, their active participation in the construction of muscle tissue. Studies were carried out using mesenchymal cells taken from 6-day-old chicken embryos and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) were used to assess angiogenesis. The graphene scaffold was readily colonized by myogenic progenitor cells and the cells dissected from heart, brain, eye, and blood vessels did not avoid the scaffold. The scaffold strongly induced myogenic progenitor cell signaling pathways and simultaneously activated proangiogenic signaling pathways via exocrine vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) secretion. The present study revealed that the graphene oxide (GO) scaffold initiates the processes of muscle cell differentiation due to mechanical interaction with myogenic progenitor cell.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCell MovementChick EmbryoChorioallantoic MembraneGene ExpressionGraphiteHumansHuman Umbilical Vein Endothelial CellsMesenchymal Stem CellsMicroscopy, Atomic ForceMyoD ProteinNeovascularization, PhysiologicTissue ScaffoldsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Agraphene oxideGraphiteMyoD1 myogenic differentiation proteinMyoD ProteinVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Aangiogenesisgraphene oxidemyogenic progenitor cells

Identifiers

PMID32545308
PMCPMC7311992
OpenAlexW3034367213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.