Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32544452›Full record

ArticleThe Annals of thoracic surgery2020

Effect of Lymph Node Assessment on Outcomes in Surgery for Limited Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer.

A Justin Rucker, Vignesh Raman, Oliver K Jawitz, Soraya L Voigt, Betty C Tong, Thomas A D'Amico, David H Harpole

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Annals of thoracic surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A Justin RuckerDivision of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. Electronic address: alvin.rucker@duke.edu.
Vignesh RamanDivision of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Oliver K JawitzDivision of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Soraya L VoigtDivision of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Betty C TongDivision of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Thomas A D'AmicoDivision of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
David H HarpoleDivision of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Duke Medical Center · US

Funding

Postdoctoral Training in Cardiovascular Clinical ResearchT32HL069749 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MARK, DANIEL B · 2003 to 2023
$6.7M
Translational Research in Surgical OncologyT32CA093245 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ALLEN, PETER J, HARPOLE, DAVID H. · 2002 to 2020
$5.2M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA093245NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL069749
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend surgery for limited stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, there is no literature on minimum acceptable lymph node retrieval in surgery for SCLC.

methodsThe National Cancer Database was queried for adult patients undergoing lobectomy for limited stage (cT1-2N0M0) SCLC from 2004 to 2015. Patients with unknown survival, staging, or nodal assessment, and patients who received neoadjuvant therapy were excluded. The number of lymph nodes assessed was studied both as a continuous variable and as a categoric variable stratified into distribution quartiles. The primary outcome was overall survival and the secondary outcome was pathologic nodal upstaging.

resultsA total of 1051 patients met study criteria. In multivariable analysis, only a retrieval of eight to 12 nodes was associated with a significant survival benefit (hazard ratio 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.56 to 0.98). However, when modeled as a continuous variable, there was no association between number of nodes assessed and survival (hazard ratio 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.98 to 1.02). The overall rate of pathologic nodal upstaging was 19%. Modeled as a continuous variable, more than seven lymph nodes assessed at time of resection was significantly associated with nodal upstaging in multivariable regression (odds ratio 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.01 to 1.06).

conclusionsIn this study, there was no clear difference in survival based on increasing the number of lymph nodes assessed during lobectomy for limited stage SCLC. However, the number of retrieved lymph nodes was associated with pathologic nodal upstaging. Therefore, patients may benefit from retrieval of more than seven lymph nodes during lobectomy for SCLC.

Indexed as

Lymph Node ExcisionPneumonectomyAgedDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesSmall Cell Lung CarcinomaSurvival RateTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID32544452
PMCPMC7958968
OpenAlexW3035598966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.