ArticleExperimental hematology2020
Engineering of targeted megabase-scale deletions in human induced pluripotent stem cells.
Article in Experimental hematology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Generation of Monosomy 21q Human iPS Cells by CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Interstitial Megabase Deletion.Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms · 2025Article
- Engineering structural variants to interrogate genome function.Nature genetics · 2024Review
- Multiscale engineering of brain organoids for disease modeling.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2024Review
- Review
- GATA2 deficiency and MDS/AML: Experimental strategies for disease modelling and future therapeutic prospects.British journal of haematology · 2022Review
- Generation of NPHP1 knockout human pluripotent stem cells by a practical biallelic gene deletion strategy using CRISPR/Cas9 and ssODN.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal · 2022Article
- Induced pluripotent stem cell models of myeloid malignancies and clonal evolution.Stem cell research · 2021Review
- Studying clonal evolution of myeloid malignancies using induced pluripotent stem cells.Current opinion in hematology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Recurrent chromosomal deletions spanning several megabases are often found in hematological malignancies. The ability to engineer deletions in model systems to functionally study their effects on the phenotype would enable, first, determination of whether a given deletion is pathogenic or neutral and, second, identification of the critical genes. Incomplete synteny makes modeling of deletions of megabase scale challenging or impossible in the mouse or other model organisms. Furthermore, despite the breakthroughs in targeted nuclease technologies in recent years, engineering of megabase-scale deletions remains challenging and has not been achieved in normal diploid human cells. Large deletions of the long arm of chromosome 7 (chr7q) occur frequently in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and are associated with poor prognosis. We previously found that we can model chr7q deletions in human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) using a modified Cre-loxP strategy. However, this strategy did not afford control over the length and boundaries of the engineered deletions, which were initiated through random chromosome breaks. Here we developed strategies enabling the generation of defined and precise chromosomal deletions of up to 22 Mb, using two different strategies: "classic" Cre-loxP recombination and CRISPR/Cas9-mediated DNA cleavage. As proof of principle, we illustrate that phenotypic characterization of the hematopoiesis derived from these iPSCs upon in vitro differentiation allows further definition of the critical region of chr7q whose hemizygosity impairs hematopoietic differentiation potential. The strategies we present here can be broadly applicable to engineering of diverse chromosomal deletions in human cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.