ArticlePloS one2020
Comparison of the change in QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube results after preventive therapy for latent tuberculosis infection.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Capturing RecentTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2024Article
- Biomarkers Correlated with Tuberculosis Preventive Treatment Response: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection, immune activation, and risk of HIV acquisition.PloS one · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe investigated changes in the interferon-γ levels before and after treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) using QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) and QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) assays. The objective was to assess whether QFT-Plus could serve as a biomarker of LTBI treatment response.
methodsWe prospectively enrolled 44 individuals whose baseline QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus showed positive results at a tertiary referral center in South Korea between March 2017 and March 2018. The results of the QFT-Plus assay were defined as positive if either or both of the antigen tubes (TB1 and/or TB2) were positive. After LTBI treatment, both tests were repeated.
resultsThe mean age of the participants was 47.6 years. The QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus assays revealed positive results in 42/44 (95.5%) and 41/44 (93.2%) participants after LTBI treatment, showing overall agreement of 93.2%, with a Cohen's kappa value of 0.37 (fair agreement). The differences between pre- and post-LTBI treatment interferon-γ levels were measured using the QFT-GIT and QFT-Plus assays. No significant differences were noted among the 3 values: the median difference in interferon-γ value with QFT-GIT, QFT-Plus TB1, and QFT-Plus TB2 was 0.211 IU/mL (IQR, -0.337-3.347), 0.025 IU/mL (IQR, -0.338-1.368), and 0.180 IU/mL (IQR, -0.490-2.278), respectively (P = 0.401).
conclusionThe change in interferon-γ levels before and after LTBI treatment measured using the QFT-Plus assay showed a similar trend to that of the QFT-GIT assay. Considering that the QFT-GIT assay is not a useful biomarker of LTBI treatment response, QFT-Plus also appears not to be useful for this purpose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.