Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32544186›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Does frequency of supportive supervisory visits influence health service delivery?-Dose and response study.

Binyam Fekadu Desta, Ismael Ali Beshir, Bekele Belayhun Tefera, Mesele Damte Argaw, Habtamu Zerihun Demeke, Mengistu Asnake Kibret

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Binyam Fekadu DestaUSAID Transform: Primary Health Care project, JSI Training & Research Institute, Inc., Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-2146-9516
Ismael Ali BeshirUSAID Transform: Primary Health Care project, JSI Training & Research Institute, Inc., Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Bekele Belayhun TeferaUSAID Transform: Primary Health Care project, Pathfinder International Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Mesele Damte ArgawUSAID Transform: Primary Health Care project, JSI Training & Research Institute, Inc., Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Habtamu Zerihun DemekeUSAID Transform: Primary Health Care project, Pathfinder International Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Mengistu Asnake KibretUSAID Transform: Primary Health Care project, Pathfinder International Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High quality care-at a minimum-is a combination of the availability of tangible resources as well as a capable and motivated health workforce. Researchers have suggested that supportive supervision can increase both the performance and motivation of health workers and the quality of care. This study is aimed at assessing the required number of visits and time between visits to bring about improvements in health service delivery. The study employed a primary health care performance improvement conceptual framework which depicts building blocks for improved health service delivery using longitudinal program outcome monitoring data collected from July 2017 to December 2019. The analysis presented in this study is based on 3,080 visits made to 1,479 health centers in the USAID Transform: Primary Health Care project's intervention districts. To assess the effects of the visits on the repeated measure of the outcome variable (Service-Delivery), multilevel linear mixed model (LMM) with maximum likelihood (ML) estimation was employed. The results showed that there was a significant dose-response relationship that consistent and significant improvement on Service-Delivery indicator was observed from first (β = -26.07, t = -7.43, p < 0.001) to second (β = -21.17, t = -6.00, p < 0.01), third (β = -15.20, t = -4.49, p < 0.02), fourth (β = -12.35, t = -3.58, p < 0.04) and fifth (β = -11.18, t = -2.86, p < 0.03) visits. The incremental effect of the visits was not significant from fifth visit to the sixth suggesting five visits are the optimal number of visits to improve service delivery at the health center level. The time interval between visits also suggested visits made between 6 to 9 months (β = -2.86, t = -2.56, p < 0.01) showed more significant contributions. Therefore, we can conclude that five visits each separated by 6 to 9 months elicits a significant service delivery improvement at health centers.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHealth Care ReformHumansLikelihood FunctionsLinear ModelsPrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID32544186
PMCPMC7297318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.