Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32544184›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Higher naloxone dosing in a quantitative systems pharmacology model that predicts naloxone-fentanyl competition at the opioid mu receptor level.

Ronald B Moss, Meghan McCabe Pryor, Rebecca Baillie, Katherine Kudrycki, Christina Friedrich, Mike Reed, Dennis J Carlo

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Naloxone Administration in Relation to Fentanyl, Xylazine, CNS Depressants, and Stimulants Exposure After Suspected Opioid Overdose: A Pilot Study.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ronald B MossAdamis Pharmaceuticals Corp, San Diego, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8662-3599
Meghan McCabe PryorRosa & Co. LLC, San Carlos, CA, United States of America.
Rebecca BaillieRosa & Co. LLC, San Carlos, CA, United States of America.
Katherine KudryckiRosa & Co. LLC, San Carlos, CA, United States of America.
Christina FriedrichRosa & Co. LLC, San Carlos, CA, United States of America.
Mike ReedRosa & Co. LLC, San Carlos, CA, United States of America.
Dennis J CarloAdamis Pharmaceuticals Corp, San Diego, CA, United States of America.
Rosa (United States) · USAdamis Pharmaceuticals (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid resuscitation of an opioid overdose with naloxone, an opioid antagonist, is critical. We developed an opioid receptor quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) model for evaluation of naloxone dosing. In this model we examined three opioid exposure levels that have been reported in the literature (25 ng/ml, 50 ng/ml, and 75 ng/ml of fentanyl). The model predicted naloxone-fentanyl interaction at the mu opioid receptor over a range of three naloxone doses. For a 2 mg intramuscular (IM) dose of naloxone at lower fentanyl exposure levels (25 ng/ml and 50 ng/ml), the time to decreasing mu receptor occupancy by fentanyl to 50% was 3 and 10 minutes, respectively. However, at a higher fentanyl exposure level (75 ng/ml), a dose of 2 mg IM of the naloxone failed to reduce mu receptor occupancy by fentanyl to 50%. In contrast, naloxone doses of 5 mg and 10 mg IM reduced mu receptor occupancy by fentanyl to 50% in 5.5 and 4 minutes respectively. These results suggest that the current doses of naloxone (2 mg IM or 4 mg intranasal (IN)) may be inadequate for rapid reversal of toxicity due to fentanyl exposure and that increasing the dose of naloxone is likely to improve outcomes.

Indexed as

Binding, CompetitiveModels, TheoreticalAnalgesics, OpioidComputer SimulationDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug OverdoseFentanylHumansNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsReceptors, Opioid, muTreatment OutcomeAnalgesics, OpioidFentanylNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsReceptors, Opioid, mu

Identifiers

PMID32544184
PMCPMC7297366
OpenAlexW3034888056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.